Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I'm a writer and editor, and I dislike the idea of this tool quite a bit. You dislike this tool the same way welders dislike computer welding or the same way truck drivers will dislike automated driving. Everyone wants to believe their job is so complex that a computer will never be able to perform the same task adequately. Is critiquing a sentence really as complex as driving a car in heavy traffic? Or playing ches…
I don't believe that at all. That is total nonsense, in fact. My criticism is of this linting tool, not of artificial intelligence. I take it for granted that anything I can do, an AI will eventually be able to do much better. A linting tool is not an AI.
Semantics aside, it's not important to slm_HN's point. We can call it an AI, an algorithm, or just a computer, and in any case it's still possible for it to find errors beyond spelling ones.
"... there is a small part of me that enjoys playing Mr. Party Pooper when I see a mob of enthusiastic programmers trying to tie down some great cultural Gulliver with a thousand tiny little automated, black-and-white rules."
I'd reexamine that part, if I were you. I suspect it may be bigger than you think it is, especially since you've already pigeonholed the creators.