Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone could explain why I was voted down, that would be great. Thanks.
I didn't vote you down, but you cannot assume the cars are of identical size and mass, or indeed that it's a car at all. Hit a truck at 35, while he is also doing 35, and you'll feel a 70mph effect all right. For a few milliseconds. Unfortunately, poles, especially old ones, do not have as much give as one would like, and large trees have basically none. Plus, their narrow aspect is a very bad thing to hit; cars are…
I was just making the point that justifying swerving out due to some undefined 70 mph effect is incorrect if you don't know what you're dealing with. And that whoever came up this 70 vs. 35 mph effect justification should realise that it mostly applies to e.g. the truck example you gave and somewhat to cars of significantly different mass / size. Therefore it's confusing advice and obscures other possible good reasons for swerving out.