Earlier quoted context omitted.
Too bad for them. They should use same-domain analytics instead. Otherwise they have no chance with me.
They also block the popular on-domain analystics including piwik, or at least they did.
UBlock Origin
131–140 of 333 posts
Re: UBlock Origin
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
>blocking GA may break your ability to actually use the site at all (many travel sites, for instance). What? How does that even work? If GA goes down, their site just stops working until it's back up?
The travel sites I saw blocked didn't fail because of GA blocking I believe, but they were depending on various other scripts. I believe they just had messy code that relied on callbacks from third party scripts -- some of which were blocked by uBlock.
Re: UBlock Origin
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
>which is the only way they make money other than ads. Yeah. > So, you use the site resources Yeah. >don't see ads Yeah. > don't add to their user/page view numbers. Yeah. >Plus, there's the fact that lots of sites use GA to handle inter-page click tracking so they can see what paths users take to analyze UI/price sensitivity/promos/etc Yeah. Well you know what ? I wouldn't be doing this if ads provider didn't abuse…
I agree absolutely. That's why I use piwik on my sites. Unfortunately, uBlock blocks piwik all the same.
Good. I don't want to contribute to your analytics. I don't want ads. I just want to browse the web without being tracked. I don't care if that means you can't pay for your site, other sites will spring up that can without annoying users with ads and without tracking them.
Re: UBlock Origin
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
The sites are being lazy and/or cheap by using GA. They can use piwik instead. As long as they are lazy, I have an equal right to be lazy.
uBlock also blocked piwik last time I checked.
Re: UBlock Origin
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Blocking Google Analytics is the main point of any blocker I would consider using.
Many sites rely on Google Analytics to be able to do their own promotions and sponsorships, which is the only way they make money other than ads. By blocking GA, the site doesn't see you as a visitor. So, you use the site resources, don't see ads and don't add to their user/page view numbers. Plus, there's the fact that lots of sites use GA to handle inter-page click tracking so they can see what paths users take to…
By blocking GA, the site doesn't see you as a visitor.
Well too bad. Maybe they should take the radical step of actually looking at their server logs.Re: UBlock Origin
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
i'm using https://www.requestpolicy.com/ (ghostery seems to phone home, requestpolicy not (afaik))
What about Disconnect or Lightbeam? (as alternatives to Ghostery)
Re: UBlock Origin
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
>which is the only way they make money other than ads. Yeah. > So, you use the site resources Yeah. >don't see ads Yeah. > don't add to their user/page view numbers. Yeah. >Plus, there's the fact that lots of sites use GA to handle inter-page click tracking so they can see what paths users take to analyze UI/price sensitivity/promos/etc Yeah. Well you know what ? I wouldn't be doing this if ads provider didn't abuse…
I agree absolutely. That's why I use piwik on my sites. Unfortunately, uBlock blocks piwik all the same.
If Piwik just analyzes server logs, there should be no way for uBlock to touch it.
But if by "uBlock blocks piwik" you mean "uBlock blocks the piwik javascript file" then that sounds like mission fuckin accomplished to me.
Re: UBlock Origin
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is blocking Google Analytics bad? Isn't blocking spyware like GA the main purpose of ad blocking software?
The vast majority of people use ad blockers to block ads. That's why almost no ad blockers block GA, etc by default. Plus, from my other comment: "Many sites rely on Google Analytics to be able to do their own promotions and sponsorships, which is the only way they make money other than ads. By blocking GA, the site doesn't see you as a visitor. So, you use the site resources, don't see ads and don't add to their use…
For #2, I actually still have to use ABP, although most are already blocked by RequestPolicy or NoScript, which I use (combined) for #1 and #3 (combined).
[0] In my opinion, even animation necessary for the main content should be click-to-start, but I cannot currently completely achieve this. But disabling GIF animation plus click-to-activate for plugins gives me most of what I want. NoScript also helps.
Re: UBlock Origin
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
> By blocking GA, the site doesn't see you as a visitor. They can still use server analytics to see me as a visitor. I even show up on Cloudflare. I don't want them tracking what I do on their site, it should be enough to know I showed up and asked for a specific page. If their business model relies on knowing more, then they chose a lousy business model. Why is there so much sympathy for ad-supported sites on HN but…
> If their business model relies on knowing more, then they chose a lousy business model. I must disagree. I certainly understand a desire for privacy and it's definitely within your right to block GA if you feel so inclined, but to assume that sites using GA to track visitors is some sort of shady business model is simply not true. I've used GA and Heap (Analytics) to obtain extremely granular information about how…
Of course the sample won't be representative any more since people who block GA probably have attributes in common. But people who block GA probably aren't who you want your site optimized for anyway, I suppose.
I don't view GA (and similar) as intrinsically harmful. I just don't believe I'm materially hurting anyone doing something legitimate by blocking it.
Re: UBlock Origin
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
> By blocking GA, the site doesn't see you as a visitor. They can still use server analytics to see me as a visitor. I even show up on Cloudflare. I don't want them tracking what I do on their site, it should be enough to know I showed up and asked for a specific page. If their business model relies on knowing more, then they chose a lousy business model. Why is there so much sympathy for ad-supported sites on HN but…
> If their business model relies on knowing more, then they chose a lousy business model. I must disagree. I certainly understand a desire for privacy and it's definitely within your right to block GA if you feel so inclined, but to assume that sites using GA to track visitors is some sort of shady business model is simply not true. I've used GA and Heap (Analytics) to obtain extremely granular information about how…