Live data from Hacker News

MIT alumni in their 50s

blogs.law.harvard.edu

131–140 of 159 posts

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an MIT alum in my 50s, let me assure you that a specific fundraiser is assigned to target you, personally and individually. "Ugh," indeed.

MIT alum in my 30s. When to babes start throwing themselves ta me because of my degree? My parents promised me this would happen.

Caltech alum in my 30s, move to the Bay Area.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#132

Ugh. Confirmation bias and sample size aside, these are MIT alumni. Aren't they already supposed to be above average? That being said, he didn't exactly say what sort of engineers these folks were. Electrical? Software? Big difference.. Also, one thing that didn't jive, if they are in financially uncomfortable retirement, why exactly are they showing up at a donors gathering?

As an MIT alum in my 50s, let me assure you that a specific fundraiser is assigned to target you, personally and individually. "Ugh," indeed.

> As an MIT alum in my 50s

Well since we have a specimen handy, can we hear your take on the article? Does it match your observations?

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MIT alum in my 30s. When to babes start throwing themselves ta me because of my degree? My parents promised me this would happen.

Caltech alum in my 30s, move to the Bay Area.

What are you talking about? There are no babes in the Bay Area.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Version control? That's, like, not the hard part.

MIT is theory-heavy and practice-light. I didn't learn databases or professional languages or version control in any of my classes.

I think the idea is that you can learn things like that pretty easily on your own, especially once you've had experience learning "harder" things in classes.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#135
I've always thought that the age discrimination problem in the software engineering world will self-solve when the first generation of programmers age into the discriminatory age brackets.

Besides, some of the best programmers I know are 50+.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#136

If we reverse the clock back to their 30's, the underlying math of these career choices isn't so kind... - The academic is completing their PHD program, with it's associated vow of poverty and about to start a multi-year tenure cagefight, in low-wage contract instructor roles. Only a small fraction will make it to full tenure; the rest will drop out to pursue industry jobs, 10+ years behind the engineers who went dir…

Some jobs are flexible, when you are judged on your current impact, some other - have guild constraints, where it takes time and effort to get into... but also, even with waning skill, once you are entrenched, it's hard to get out.

IMHO the good thing for meritocracy is when there is no shift between skill and position. Eg in academia there is ~10-20 year shift.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#137
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

good programmers can always consult. old managers can't do nothing unless he is hired at a big company, which is exactly what won't happen according to this

> good programmers can always consult. as if ageism didn't exist in the consulting business ...

Hiring managers might see age as a disadvantage, but most CEOs would rather hire a peer than someone they view as a child.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#138

This post really scares me and part of me wants to quit this industry even though I enjoy coding. Ageism is a brutal reality.

I don't know what the HN perspective is on linking to your own old comments, but I can't write this any better today than I did last year: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7374123

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#139
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an MIT alum in my 50s, let me assure you that a specific fundraiser is assigned to target you, personally and individually. "Ugh," indeed.

> As an MIT alum in my 50s Well since we have a specimen handy, can we hear your take on the article? Does it match your observations?

Another MIT alum here in my 50s: Phil is not far off, but I think he is underestimating the selection bias for that event.

Even back in the 80s, nobody chose engineering because it is a cushy lifelong path.

Edit: BTW, many of his posts are interesting.

Re: MIT alumni in their 50s

#140

If we reverse the clock back to their 30's, the underlying math of these career choices isn't so kind... - The academic is completing their PHD program, with it's associated vow of poverty and about to start a multi-year tenure cagefight, in low-wage contract instructor roles. Only a small fraction will make it to full tenure; the rest will drop out to pursue industry jobs, 10+ years behind the engineers who went dir…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN