Earlier quoted context omitted.
And your evidence that this isn't a zero-sum game, is, exactly, what? Me probably. And all the folk I know with reading habits like mine who have not bothered getting an ebook reader yet, despite having problems seeing the floor for books sometimes. edit - I think Amazon are complete and utter [redacted] over DRM, the 1984 debacle, their general attitude, etc. That said, I think they are probably right that everyone…
>[redacted] Either you can say the word or you can't. Luckily our language has ways of working around saying certain words, so you don't have to put in [redacted].
Amazon/Hachette Business Interruption
131–133 of 133 posts
Re: Amazon/Hachette Business Interruption
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yet oddly enough Amazon seem to have gotten stingier with the flash memory on a Kindle. 2 GB? Just give me a damn microSD slot so I can bump that up to a level I'm happy with. A few biggish PDFs (e-Textbooks come to mind) will obliterate that space.
Other ereader devices exist. Kobo devices have microSD cards. You have to unscrew the case to get at it, but still, you'd probably only have to do it once.
Re: Amazon/Hachette Business Interruption
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it was, there would be a healthy e-reader market with competing devices and choices for consumers, which would deprive Amazon of business leverage over content distribution. Barnes & Noble had a brief moment of glory when their first Nook color tablet was cheaper, better and unlocked. Devs were selling rooted Android SD cards on eBay. If BN had opened up the hardware, they had a chance of gaining the scale needed…
A big problem with the competing device market is that books aren't portable between Amazon and alternatives (but they are between the alternatives). So, if you've bought a number of e-books on Amazon, switching becomes much more difficult.