Earlier quoted context omitted.
See, you are trying to say that there are two possible positions - either the government is allowed to interfere with peoples lives, or it is not. Most people believe something in the middle - there are situations where they would like the government to interfere. For instance, if they pay you for a service, and you don't deliver it, they might want the government to take action against you. In this case, you could a…
> there are situations where they would like the government to interfere > Could we maintain a society like this without any enforcement of law? > I think the government should prevent people being harmed by predictable irrational behavior So it seems you believe that a government is a monopoly on force, but think it's a good thing. a very interesting viewpoint. How is that different from the famous quote [1] from 19…
I write too much, but you make an interesting point. More interesting because I find it hard to imagine a world where governments do not have a monopoly on force and the things function. Clearly, I need to think harder/better.