131–134 of 134 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Congress can and has made murder legal: people executed under the death penalty have "Homicide" listed on their death certificate as the cause of death.
Homicide != murder.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The US could repeal the first amendment, and explicitly make being a buddhist illegal, if enough congressmen got on board. This actually ties into the anti-federalist argument against the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Where in the Constitution is Congress authorized to make laws regarding the practice of religion?
> Where in the Constitution is Congress authorized to make laws regarding the practice of religion? The Commerce Clause, of course! I imagine they would argue that money donated to churches would otherwise be used to purchase goods and services. Or that time spent worshipping would otherwise be used in production. I'm only half joking.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Where in the Constitution is Congress authorized to make laws regarding the practice of religion? The Commerce Clause, of course! I imagine they would argue that money donated to churches would otherwise be used to purchase goods and services. Or that time spent worshipping would otherwise be used in production. I'm only half joking.
If you think the parent is incorrect, I invite everyone to look up Gonzales v. Raich, and Wickard v. Filburn. Everything is commerce, and therefore regulated under Congress via the commerce clause.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you think the parent is incorrect, I invite everyone to look up Gonzales v. Raich, and Wickard v. Filburn. Everything is commerce, and therefore regulated under Congress via the commerce clause.
I don't think it's incorrect, which is why I brought up the commerce clause in the first place (with Filburn in mind). I agree, to congress everything is commerce. It's just such a farce that it would strain credulity if it wasn't so clearly evidenced. We truly live in a mockery of a rational world.