Live data from Hacker News

We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

mass-driver.com

131–136 of 136 posts

Re: We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> In fact, your comment (regardless of attitude on AI) is exactly an example of the kind of attitude that is in opposition to the curiosity, positivity, and humanity that HN historically represents. My patience has worn out. I've tolerated the anti-AI sentiment for years, but at this point it's beyond grating. I've heard all the arguments, I've been called all the names. The anti-AI crowd is frequently uncivil, and t…

[flagged]

This is the kind of civil discourse HN allows these days.

Re: We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

#132

[flagged]

Maybe you think this is a witty comment, but ironically it illustrates exactly the problem with outsourcing your thinking to a machine. All they needed to do was raise the instance limit, which they immediately did when they saw the surge of traffic. No expensive tokens needed, no agents needed, no outsourcing their work to some calculator. The problem was solved even faster than an LLM would have, and they maintaine…

Hacker News! Never change.

Re: We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is the kind of civil discourse HN allows these days.

[flagged]

We've banned this account. Enough is enough. We don't care what your opinion is, and we work hard to make this a space where everyone's opinion can be expressed and heard, but it can't work when people think they have license to go around abusing other community members like this.

Re: We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>others just want to live life as a passenger, not think, and have AI do all the work. Fuck, doesn't everyone? The future we were promised is one where machines did all the work leaving humans free to pursue a richer existence, whether that's creative pastimes or just laying on a beach. Instead of democratizing the future, essentially every technological advance since the printing press has served only to increase th…

Lots of people enjoy doing things - no need to treat them like assholes just for that. The sci-fi version of AI frees people up - the real version sometimes (mostly?) takes away enjoyable work and reduces people's ability to make a life for their family without being miserable (which is the fault of the practical reality of our society - not inherently AI's fault).

>no need to treat them like assholes just for that.

Hmm, I wasn't trying to imply anyone is an asshole for enjoying things. Is that how it came off?

Re: We don't use AI in any of our design or production processes

#136
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For font design, and art beyond what could be called boilerplate art, real art, not just something to quickly throw on a website so you have something there, AI is not a good tool. I think AI will take over many jobs, firstly in the arrangement of characters and words into stock text, or coding. But art, not just pictures, is something that will take longer and may never happen. Design is very similar. Good art makes…

AI is going to replace artists in exact the same way rhythm machines replaced drummers.

If the rhythm machines were making the beats, your analogy would be sound. Unfortunately, they do not.

AI has already started earning good money in music. The Velvet Sundown, for example was getting a million listens a month on Spotify.

People still make clothes by hand but try finding one at your local shopping centre.

Post reply on HN