Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

nytimes.com

131–140 of 159 posts

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#131
post #22

The window has basically closed for them for the time being. The business math just isn’t there. The best option at this point is kick the can down the road and hope market sentiment improves next year. Not much signal that it will, and quite a lot of signal the sentiment only declines, but pumping the brakes is the least worst option on the table.

There may never be another window. They will run out of money especially if open models catch up.

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just googling the ticker shows it at 149, which is below its opening.

> Just googling the ticker shows it at 149, which is below its opening. I thought it opened at 135.

135 is what you could buy for in the public offering. The shares opened trading at 150.

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#134
Part of the issue is the respective positioning:

- OpenAI wants to be the consumer version of AI, modeled after Google and Meta, with a mostly free universal service powered by ads and e-commerce. They haven't fully shown that model can work. The big problem is the lack of zero marginal costs as each new user requires GPU spend.

- Anthropic positions itself more as enterprise AI, modeled after Microsoft ironically enough, and charges big companies for services. The economics of coding agents work but GPUs get expensive fast and open models are getting good enough for most use cases.

So it's a race between ads and e-commerce offsetting AI spend and open source eating almost everyone's lunch.

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#136

AI exits in America probably have a political cliff approaching fast as populist backlash will hit them, or perhaps they see political winds favorable to regulatory capture in the future and are waiting for that?

> AI exits in America probably have a political cliff approaching fast as populist backlash will hit them The populist backlash is coming for datacenters. I'm unconvinced that's truly problematic to these companies given data travels close to the speed of light and plenty of countries have energy, data interconnects and governments unresponsive to locals' concerns.

This morning I heard a convincing argument that the data center backlash is only really significant in the USA because jobs here equal health care access. Europeans can afford to be less threatened existentially.

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#137

With all the uncertainty about AI regulation, I don't think now is the time. How do you even value a company when we don't even know if GPT-6 will be made available to the general public?

OpenAI and Anthropic valuations are based on the premise that they may develop AGI in the near future. How do you value a company based on that premise? Throwing regulations into the mix doesn't make the problem much harder than it already is.

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#138
post #132

They realised their numbers are much worse than anthropics

You know anthropics numbers? They still haven’t filed either.

They said they’re profitable on operating profit.

Think it’s pretty safe to assume theirs are less of a dumpster fire

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#139
post #70
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ChatGPT is the 5th most visited website in the world and gets a ridiculous amount of user data. They're going to be an advertising powerhouse.

The advertising angle is significantly overrated. Theres only so many ad dollars to go around and so every dollar they make they have to take from so other player like Google. With Google having decent AI search now for free OpenAI is already well behind here.

Honestly if ads start getting put into chats that service is dead to me

Re: OpenAI leans toward waiting until next year for IPO

#140

Part of the issue is the respective positioning: - OpenAI wants to be the consumer version of AI, modeled after Google and Meta, with a mostly free universal service powered by ads and e-commerce. They haven't fully shown that model can work. The big problem is the lack of zero marginal costs as each new user requires GPU spend. - Anthropic positions itself more as enterprise AI, modeled after Microsoft ironically en…

Even open source models need hardware and energy to inference. Therefore, anyone offering a free ChatGPT competitor will be using the same unit economics.

My bet is that OpenAI will make free ChatGPT work through ads.

Post reply on HN