Live data from Hacker News

Want your images back? That'll be $5

lutr.dev

131–140 of 286 posts

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#131
I have a legacy email account with a "used to be popular" ISP

It's free, I've been using it for ~25 years, you know the drill.

However, I lost access to it when I bought a new phone, and everything didn't transfer over. I couldn't reset the password without buying the 'premium' service, it was only $10 or $15, I was able to cancel after (so I wasn't re-charged next year or month).

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#133

Just do a GDPR request and get all the data they have on you for free. I’m pretty sure they would have to give you your photos as part of that.

Could also say you’re a California resident and get your data too. They’ll probably just ignore or say no if they’re being that shady.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#134
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://xkcd.com/1150/

Back in the 2000s there was an implicit social contract that websites would treat your uploaded data with respect. You weren't putting your stuff in Chad's garage, you were putting it in a professional seeming storage business that just happened to be free because none of us really understood how to monetize the net.

I will say personally I didn't feel this way in the 2000's, and I was a child at the start of that decade. Maybe I am cynical.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#135

Shout out to Flickr! No matter how many gigabytes you had uploaded, you can still access them. You just can’t upload more without a Flickr Pro plan.

No, because I am dealing with this right now. I stopped paying for Flickr Pro after 20+ years and can only download my photos in bulk as 1024px resolution in order to get back under the free plan limits unless I pay for Flickr Pro… which is $82/year. My photos are held hostage unless I pay.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've done a couple on a debit card and it's gone pretty smoothly. I paid around £200 for an online service who they effectively ghosted me, so I submitted a chargeback to my bank, and they said they'd get in contact with the provider. I never heard back about it other than getting my money so I'm guessing they ghosted my bank too

Chargebacks are a pain and as a seller you almost always lose them, Stripe advices to refund based on signal's they get that a disput is requested. As a company there is just no point in fighting them. I even had emails of clients they made a mistake and didnt realise it was our payment, but even that wasn;t enough.

As a consumer who has only tried honest chargebacks within their 'consumer rights' and has never won them, apparently you can fight them, and apparently companies deem them worth fighting.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#137
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://xkcd.com/1150/

Back in the 2000s there was an implicit social contract that websites would treat your uploaded data with respect. You weren't putting your stuff in Chad's garage, you were putting it in a professional seeming storage business that just happened to be free because none of us really understood how to monetize the net.

Back in the 2000s I think a much larger fraction of the web was running out Chad’s garage.

You got a Pentium III and a DSL connection? Run a website! Run an IRC server!

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#138
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://xkcd.com/1150/

Back in the 2000s there was an implicit social contract that websites would treat your uploaded data with respect. You weren't putting your stuff in Chad's garage, you were putting it in a professional seeming storage business that just happened to be free because none of us really understood how to monetize the net.

That works when you are the product and they have customers who want to use their humans for some other business activity. If they have viable customers, you are useless as a product.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would have preferred they delete it The fact that they did delete it, and then tried to sell access to bupkis, is just the icing on the scummy corporate cake, eh?

From the story I was assuming that OP maybe had multiple accounts he forgot about or that he actually uploaded the images without logging in, and that’s why there were no images to be restored. If the images actually were on the account and they deleted them, it would be crazy.

Yes, that's exactly it! I must have had multiple accounts. I don't think they deleted any of my images.

Re: Want your images back? That'll be $5

#140
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://xkcd.com/1150/

Back in the 2000s there was an implicit social contract that websites would treat your uploaded data with respect. You weren't putting your stuff in Chad's garage, you were putting it in a professional seeming storage business that just happened to be free because none of us really understood how to monetize the net.

social contracts stop working when they're not between individual people with a shared experience

when you make a contract with facebook or any other large site you're making a contract with a legal team tasked with protecting their money

at a certain point scale only works through oppression

Post reply on HN