[dead]
CUDA-oxide: Nvidia's official Rust to CUDA compiler
131–132 of 132 posts
Re: CUDA-oxide: Nvidia's official Rust to CUDA compiler
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
that ship has long sailed, "it no longer matters" saying a codebase, an article was written with AI doesn't mean much, it could be good, it could be bad. folks often say it to generate outrage, but that means nothing. is the codebase great, good, bad, terrible? that's the only thing that matters.
Even as someone who uses a lot of AI, if you can't be bothered to at least give it a prompt like "Go through the documentation and comments in detail and remove any obvious AI shibboleths like emdashes, it's not x it's y, rule-of-three, 'delve', excessive grandiosity and flourishes, boldness, bullet points, etc", you should receive a brisk kick in the rear.
I feel bad about most of my comments since this is the thing I say too. If you can't be bothered to write shit, why would I read your shit?