131–140 of 355 posts
'Science progresses one funeral at a time...' It is often the case that an entire field is led by a few influential people and until they leave others can't get the air they need to make real progress.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
there is even easier way to estimate the chances of time wasting - it is a "rationalist" website, an "effective altruism"-like version of rationality. wrt. original post - quickly googled, and that for example https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-are-Amyloid-Plaques... - pretty short and seems to be clear that amyloids do have some correlation while may or may be not the cause. "Amyloid plaques form one of the tw…
Huge codebase with years of fixes, features and hacks added on top and nothing ever refactored. It’s a miracle it works at all
Big Pharma refuses to believe that the gut microbiome plays a significant role in human health. They either don't take it seriously or think it's so complex that it's not worth working on. I think they're totally wrong and that the microbiome is the arbiter of not only Alzheimers but cancer and other metabolic disorders like T2 Diabetes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which illnesses have been cured? Diabetes, cancer? > From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). Researchers are people, but they are paid and directed. They can't go off and do what they like. The corporation directs them, a…
Imagine your role is allocating spending on $10B/year of medical research and you are presented with two strategies: spend everything searching for the cure for one poorly understood condition, or allocate to treatments improving standard of care for 100 conditions. Improving standard of care for 100 is less risky/more profitable because you have more shots at an expensive process with a high failure rate. And it is…
The point I am making is that you are a/ not getting cured, and b/ paying a lot of money. The reason for this, is this is best strategy for maximising profits. Its really the exact same model as your local heroin/crack dealer.
Please set me straight if those conditions differ in your case.
Profits are what pharma companies want.
The consumer is mostly labouring under the illusion that companies want the best for you. They are not your mum. They want what's best for them. And, most people would do the same - no one is gifting anyone health.
All I'm saying is let's drop the illusions and fantasy and call a spade a spade.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you are wrong, for several reasons. From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). From marketing and sales perspective, look at what happen to pharma companies capitalization when Ozempic appeared: a relatively small El…
Which illnesses have been cured? Diabetes, cancer? > From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). Researchers are people, but they are paid and directed. They can't go off and do what they like. The corporation directs them, a…
Chicken pox, polio, hepatitis C, dracunculiasis, yaws, malaria (on the way of it), tuberculosis, syphilis, everything that can be killed with antibiotics, rubella...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you are wrong, for several reasons. From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). From marketing and sales perspective, look at what happen to pharma companies capitalization when Ozempic appeared: a relatively small El…
Which illnesses have been cured? Diabetes, cancer? > From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). Researchers are people, but they are paid and directed. They can't go off and do what they like. The corporation directs them, a…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which illnesses have been cured? Diabetes, cancer? > From the human perspective, researchers are people, and they do have their incentives. Making a breakthrough, of any kind, is important for them - even if for their career (but many do genuinely care and want to help humanity as a whole). Researchers are people, but they are paid and directed. They can't go off and do what they like. The corporation directs them, a…
> Which illnesses have been cured? Diabetes, cancer? Chicken pox, polio, hepatitis C, dracunculiasis, yaws, malaria (on the way of it), tuberculosis, syphilis, everything that can be killed with antibiotics, rubella...
Halcyon days.
"One possibility: a leading hypothesis pursued by researchers (and funders) was built on science that now appears to be fraudulent." Possibly the most likely possibility?
There are multiple factors, but the one that contributes the most is that it's actually a very challenging disease to study and improve on. 1. It acts on the brain, one of the organs we understand the least. 2. It's relatively slow acting, and easy to miss in the early stages. 3. It impacts the older population which will have confounding health factors. 4. It doesn't fit neatly into a big category we already know a…
Think of it like brushfire in an ecosystem, or species population imbalances leading to catastrophic breakdown. These are better understood in terms of system state and preconditions, as opposed to a trigger event.
Infectious disease, at least in the classic acute form (whether that's bacterial and fast - cholera - or viral and slow - HIV), is a more mechanistic process which can be halted by blocking a single step in its pathway.
Systems that remain healthy and balanced via dynamic processes are harder to reason about and fix, because the root cause of a disease state can be dozens of little things adding up to the system losing its ability to maintain homeostasis.
Alzheimer's is basically an advanced form of gum disease caused by Porphyromonas gingivalis) that has infiltrated into your jaw and then traveled into your brain where it causes systemic inflammation which in turn lets other pathogens in that cause neurodegeneration.
There is probably no cure because the only thing you can do in dentistry is prevention and preventative dentistry is still in its infancy.
This is probably wasted on the HN crowd though, because I haven't seen any demand for preventing Alzheimer's.