Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

techcrunch.com

131–140 of 308 posts

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#131
Does anyone feel that the jig is almost up? Surely the returns aren’t anywhere close to what investors expect with the sheer amount of cash at this point in time.

Are Anthropic and OpenAI rushing to IPO for immediate cash so they can delay the inevitable? Surely this cycle of robbing Peter to pay Paul to pay John to pay Tim must end.

We are only just now getting a taste of the “true cost” of these tokens. Then there is a lack of compute bottlenecking everything. Even now I’m looking at the 7.5x rate of tokens for Opus 4.7

Open models are promising and cost a fraction of what they proprietary models cost which the big two are vulnerable to when companies start to feel the cost of tokens.

Will data centres be built fast enough and powered sufficiently to lower the cost of compute thus tokens?

Is it just a giant Hail Mary to get to AGI ASAP before the economy collapses?

Above all else, I simply feel the models have plateaued. I am noticing productivity loss for tasks I deem as “complex”

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#133

Isn’t this kind of like the Nvidia/OpenAI deal? Just circulating debt/money

With chip development you need scale in order to get to the edge. It makes sense to finance demand so you can get to scale it's not like it's a ponzi scheme.

Anthropic gets access to limited compute resources and Amazon gets demand to justify increased R&D and capex + feedback from the best users in the field.

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#134

Does anyone feel that the jig is almost up? Surely the returns aren’t anywhere close to what investors expect with the sheer amount of cash at this point in time. Are Anthropic and OpenAI rushing to IPO for immediate cash so they can delay the inevitable? Surely this cycle of robbing Peter to pay Paul to pay John to pay Tim must end. We are only just now getting a taste of the “true cost” of these tokens. Then there…

> Open models are promising and cost a fraction of what they proprietary models cost which the big two are vulnerable to when companies start to feel the cost of tokens.

Anthropic are scared of open weight models and need to fear-monger towards you to continue paying for their models.

That's the whole point of their 'safety' marketing narrative, account bans, and Dario being the AI scarecrow scaremongering everyone about nonsense like 'Mythos' towards the world.

'Mythos' is already here in the form of open-weight models that also found the same vulnerabilities as Anthropic did.

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#135
post #106

If you think you need to spend $100B, does using a third-party cloud provider still make sense? It doesn’t matter what sweet deal Amazon is pitching—in that scenario, you’d want to own your stack. Especially in a hyper-competitive field like this, where margins are going to matter a lot soon. It feels like these hyperscalers are just raising as much as they can giving extremely rosy projections becauses these sooner…

The problem is that at that scale, the alternative is building your own data centers. You'd probably want at least 2 in the US, 2 in Europe, 2 in Asia, maybe 1 in Africa and 1 in LATAM. So 8-10, and you need at least half of them ready "on time." What does "on time" mean? You'll need to negotiate with local authorities, some friendly, some not. Data centers aren't exactly popular neighbors these days. Then negotiate…

Translation: Antropic never intends to spend $100 billion on AWS.

Every single argument you've brought up is irrelevant in the face of billions of dollars. If you intend to consume $100 billion dollars in data center infrastructure, you're going to find a way to accomplish it while cutting out the middlemen.

Meanwhile if you're flaky and never intend to spend that money, you're going to come up with a way to pay someone else to deal with those problems and quit paying the moment they don't.

You'd never do both at the same time. You'd never commit your money and give them control over your business critical infrastructure.

Hence the deal is a sham. The $100 billion are a lie. Thank you for telling us.

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#136
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GPUs are lasting longer than foreseen, in fact old GPUs are more valuable now (making more money!) than they were three years ago when they were new. Tokens will continue to increase in price until the supply meets the demand. That's going to take a while.

Are old datacenter GPUs making more money than they were before? Various sources point to GPUs dying quickly (in 2024, a Google engineer suggested 3 years maximum), and even if they don't, newer chips cause rapid depreciation of older ones.[1] [0]: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/datacenter-g... [1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/14/ai-gpu-depreciation-coreweav...

If you try to track down the actual source for that Tom's Hardware link, it becomes pretty obvious that the claim is not credible. [0]

GPUs do not burn out in three years, H100 rentals are priced at the same level as two years ago, and are effectively sold out. [1]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46203986#46208221

[1] https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/the-great-gpu-shortage...

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#137

I'm no economist, but how exactly does this make sense? Amazon is basically just giving them 5B which will then be used to repay them back 20x that amount??

The $5B isn't a gift. Amazon is buying shares for $5B, and they're getting a spending commitment. I don't have any insight into the agreement, but on a ten year $100B spending commitment, I would expect $5B to be spent in no more than 3 years, and likely sooner.

In my reading, Amazon is giving $5B of usage credits in exchange for shares. If Anthropic works out, it's a good deal for Amazon. If it doesn't, they lose on their invesment sheet, but they got ~ $5B in revenue, so it looks good on their operating sheet. And it helped justify a build out that they can sell to others.

For Anthropic, this lets them operate for more time without having to make numbers work. If Anthropic works out, they'll figure out the $100B commitment later. If it doesn't work out, it's not their problem.

It's probably faster to build up amazon's capacity with amazon's money than to build owned capacity with someone else's money at the scale they're looking to build out.

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

xAI built a datacenter in a few weeks, if I remember correctly.

That’s PR hype. They built it quickly, but they didn’t go from deciding they wanted a data center to having it running in weeks. You can’t even get the hardware at that scale without months or years of order lead time. NVidia doesn’t have warehouses full of compute hardware waiting for someone to come get it. They also reused an existing building. Basically, they put 100,000 GPUs into a building and attached the nece…

Why does this matter? The deal is supposed to last 10 years. If you don't pay AWS to order Nvidia GPUs for you, Nvidia won't have to deliver them to AWS, they will have exactly the same quantity of GPUs, but this time they can deliver to you.

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#139
post #7

Someone can explain to me what's the expectations for these AI labs? I mostly see their products as commodity at this point, with strong open source contenders. Eventually it will become hard to justify the premium on these models.

Please, some of us are long NVIDIA...let us cope in peace. :-) Here is the thing nobody wants to say out loud or they are too dumb to realize. AI is intelligence, and intelligence has almost never been the binding constraint on productivity. So you will get no productivity increase from the AI bubble. Yes, you read that correctly. The test is simple, if raw brainpower were the bottleneck, you could 10x any company by…

> Jevons does not save you either,

There's also a very strong Trurl and Klapaucius [1] component to this AI craziness, as in I remember a passage in Lem's The Cyberiad where either Trurl or Klapaucius were "discussing" with an intelligent/AGI robot and asking it for stuff-to-know/information, at which point said AGI robot started literally inundating them with information, paper on top of paper on top of paper of information. At that point it doesn't even matter if that information is correct or smart or whatever, because by that point the very amount of said information has changed everything into a futile endeavour.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cyberiad

Re: Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return

#140

If you think you need to spend $100B, does using a third-party cloud provider still make sense? It doesn’t matter what sweet deal Amazon is pitching—in that scenario, you’d want to own your stack. Especially in a hyper-competitive field like this, where margins are going to matter a lot soon. It feels like these hyperscalers are just raising as much as they can giving extremely rosy projections becauses these sooner…

My guess is they are bound not by capital as much as they are physical resources. Amazon probably has the land, crews, etc. to build out more data centers faster than Anthropic can right now. The scarce resources are the chips and electricians not the money!
Post reply on HN