Earlier quoted context omitted.
This will end with the only way to authenticate the people we're talking to is meeting them at the coffeeshop in the morning.
Did you forget about Blade Runner?
12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
131–140 of 167 posts
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#132They even have a scrolling 5-star reviews section, clearly generated: https://oneuptime.com/#reviews-title https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/commit/538e40c4ae724e... https://github.com/OneUptime/oneuptime/commit/2bc585df20e6bb... You can fabricate a professional business image in a few days with AI now. It's going to be hard to build an honest brand when everyone is going to point and say "vibe coded slop" becau…
you can't make this up
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#133Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Who is "we"? Definitely not Google or any other major tech company, they're all actively encouraging this. Google has been fighting aggressively to replace its search results with snippets, now generated by LLMs, to avoid sending traffic to other websites. If they continue, they will basically lead Google Search to a tipping point where a good competitor can take this market by storm. Microsoft also believed Window…
The fact is what people really want from a search engine is a single perfect result that answers their query exactly. An LLM does the 'single result' bit, but it's dubious whether or not it's a perfect answer. Most of the time that's probably not very important so long as the answer satisfies the search enough that the user is happy. Google is trying to turn Search into that product e.g. the single answer to a given…
Well... Maybe, but what's the point of an answer if you can't trust it? For ultra-fast answers for unimportant stuff I keep Cerebras tab open.
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#135It's becoming much harder to determine on a daily basis what content is original, thought-out by a person, and trustworthy. Ironically, verifiably-old content is easier to trust now. Examples from recent personal experience: 1) Some time ago I was searching for growing information about a specific and uncommonly-grown plant, and was led to a top-ranked website with long pages containing everything about it, including…
You're making the classic mistake of looking for a trustworthy information source and then trusting it, instead of focusing on whether the information itself is trustworthy regardless of source. It's literally the same as my grandma saying "they said so on TV, therefore it must be true" while completely dismissing anything I've read on the internet because reasons. If you develop the skill of judging information by i…
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#136It's becoming much harder to determine on a daily basis what content is original, thought-out by a person, and trustworthy. Ironically, verifiably-old content is easier to trust now. Examples from recent personal experience: 1) Some time ago I was searching for growing information about a specific and uncommonly-grown plant, and was led to a top-ranked website with long pages containing everything about it, including…
You're making the classic mistake of looking for a trustworthy information source and then trusting it, instead of focusing on whether the information itself is trustworthy regardless of source. It's literally the same as my grandma saying "they said so on TV, therefore it must be true" while completely dismissing anything I've read on the internet because reasons. If you develop the skill of judging information by i…
> If you develop the skill of judging information by its merit rather than source..
Did you read example #1? I'm not talking about some piece of code from an LLM that you can verify or some political opinion that you can take with a grain of salt, but information that you can only gain and/or judge through expertise:
If you're not a physicist yourself, you can't judge "information by its merit" on specific physics topics, because you don't have a solid baseline.
Similarly, in growing plants, each plant has its own peculiarities, and only people experienced in growing it can tell you anything useful - it's knowledge accumulated by trial and error. Not knowledge that your "great discerning mind" can assess on its own. Even a botanist can't tell you the ideal growing conditions of a plant that they've never studied before.
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#137I suspect we'll address this by just going back to older ranking algorithms for search. We'll go back to the primary signal of good content being links from trusted sources. People gaming the content based algorithms will eventually cause their own downfall.
> I suspect we'll address this Who is "we"? Definitely not Google or any other major tech company, they're all actively encouraging this. > trusted sources. What trusted sources are there that haven't yet been taken over by AI?
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#138Ironically due to slop I feel like we are regressing as a civilization 2020, want to know how to use Redix for Redis connections in Elixir? Google it and the results were most likely high quality, written by senior engineers who knew what they were doing Today google that, and it will be endless amounts of slop
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Now that we have better ML, maybe we could take "link sentiment" into account too.
[dead]
Re: 12k AI-generated blog posts added in a single commit
#140I suspect we'll address this by just going back to older ranking algorithms for search. We'll go back to the primary signal of good content being links from trusted sources. People gaming the content based algorithms will eventually cause their own downfall.
I don't have a ton of hope just yet because I think it's still an incentives problem rather than a technical one. I got tired of the increasing AI slop in my YouTube Music feed and switched to Deezer a few months ago. Since then, not a single AI artist I've been able to spot. If a relatively marginal player like that can manage it, why can't Spotify or YTM? My suspicion is simply that Deezer actually actually tries.…
Its a public good we refuse to turn into a government service for nebulous reasons.