Live data from Hacker News

Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

cyberinsider.com

131–140 of 178 posts

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#131
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

of course it does. Why do you think google buys the rights to firefox's search bar (as a default setting)?

And by extension, all users of FOSS must be the product, right?

And by extension, all users of FOSS must be the product, right?

Crowd sourced Development and Quality Assurance for something multiple companies, governments and the military are using.

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#132
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why does a browser need screen sharing built in? Is that maybe used for video calls?

Im not talking about an api. Im talking about an end user feature. Or are you telling me that chrome has a fucking video call client built in as well?

[deleted]

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#133
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

of course it does. Why do you think google buys the rights to firefox's search bar (as a default setting)?

And by extension, all users of FOSS must be the product, right?

When you use a FOSS product more, the person that wrote the code doesn't end up spending more money. When you use a free service more, someone is paying for that usage and resources.

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#134
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold" This is such a un-nuanced take. In this case Firefox's route-to-market is the product. It's a distribution channel where some people who receive the free version will upgrade. Free tiers for products where some will pay to upgrade seems like a reasonable compromise, but it does depend on how the deal is structured. If Mullvad pays Firefox for the free use…

>This is such a un-nuanced take. I agree in principle, but we interact with hundreds of companies per day. Which ones are honest and which ones are taking advantage of us? I really don't have the cycles to run it all down, and keep up with it over time. Perhaps Firefox VPN will be totally private initially and then violate privacy 2 years in? Would I ever know? Maybe? I need to err on the side of caution for a lot of…

True but you chose to post in the comment section of a news story, I don't think it's unreasonable to ask for more nuance than for something you see randomly in the wild.

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#135
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold" This is such a un-nuanced take. In this case Firefox's route-to-market is the product. It's a distribution channel where some people who receive the free version will upgrade. Free tiers for products where some will pay to upgrade seems like a reasonable compromise, but it does depend on how the deal is structured. If Mullvad pays Firefox for the free use…

"Firefox’s free VPN won’t be using Mullvad’s infra though; it’s hosted on Mozilla servers around the world (if beta testing of the feature done in late 2025 tracks)." From OMG Ubuntu

What makes me not want to use it is I assume Mozilla has a legal presence all around the world.

Two huge reasons people use VPNs is piracy and saying things/accessing content that's not legal in their country. If that company has a legal presence in your country, then they'll hand over that data to the police should you criticize the wrong person or download a movie without permission. At which point a VPN becomes kind of pointless.

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#136
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I doubt Mullvad would be doing this if they weren't getting compensated given they've always said (even right now[1]) they don't offer a free tier since they don't believe it makes sense. The other aspect is I expect it would stain the IP pool further. VPN IPs often end up on various blacklists due to abuse and introducing a wave of free users would only make it worse for paying customers. [1] https://mullvad.net/en/…

It's already pretty bad for mullvad. 3/4 of the websites I visit do bot checks it used to just be a few.

It's mainly because nearly all VPN providers all use the same shady providers - M247, xtom, fdc, datapacket etc.. Most CDN setups will "challenge" those ASNs.

People think Mullvad is special but it's same shit as all the others in most cities/markets, I wish they would use some of their big ad money spend to deleverage from these typical dodgy scam hosting ASNs.

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Firefox’s free VPN won’t be using Mullvad’s infra though; it’s hosted on Mozilla servers around the world (if beta testing of the feature done in late 2025 tracks)." From OMG Ubuntu

What makes me not want to use it is I assume Mozilla has a legal presence all around the world. Two huge reasons people use VPNs is piracy and saying things/accessing content that's not legal in their country. If that company has a legal presence in your country, then they'll hand over that data to the police should you criticize the wrong person or download a movie without permission. At which point a VPN becomes ki…

The only time i use a VPN is when i'm traveling and I don't trust "free coffee shop wifi"

I probably won't use Mozilla's offering, because i want any VPN to cover the whole system, not just the browser (correct me if i've made a bad assumption here)

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#139
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> > Also, "free": "If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold" > HN is "free" too. :) Indeed: you deliver valuable information about market trends, market sentiments, technology, ... to SV startups and investors. Additionally, Hacker News is basically a marketing expense of YC.

And crowd sourced think tank.

Eh, a think tank usually has some kind of minimum requirements, such as education or industry experience. The usefulness of hackernews lies in "farming the opinions of the kind of dork that hangs out on hackernews" -- this is useful data, but "crowd sourced think tank" is trumping it up a bit i think

Re: Mozilla to launch free built-in VPN in upcoming Firefox 149

#140

As a Firefox user: if I want a VPN I'll use an actual VPN. Focus on making a great browser, and not all this distraction. Also, "free": "If you're not paying for it, you're the product being sold"

I'd love to have a free VPN directly integrated into the browser, it's not a distraction. It's a developer tool for website developers.

it's nice but i don't see why it has to be made and ran by the browser maker itself
Post reply on HN