Earlier quoted context omitted.
If I have to go to a thing and push a button, I'd rather the button do the thing I wanted in the first place. Voice assistants are for when my hands are full or I don't want to get up. (I wrote more about my home automation philosophy in another comment[1]). Also I have all my voice assistant devices mounted to the ceiling 1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47399909
What if you have two things? You'd then need two buttons. The push button is a perfectly viable option, it just needs to be in a form factor that's works. Could be as simple as a tiny low-energy Bluetooth board with a coin battery that will last several months.
My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
131–140 of 153 posts
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#132Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#133If you're less concerned about privacy, I use Gemini 2.5 Flash for this and it's exceptionally good and fast as a HA assistant while being much cheaper than the electricity that would be needed to keep a 3090 awake. The thing that kills this for me (and they even mentioned it) is wake word detection. I have both the HA voice preview and FPH Satellite1 devices, plus have experimented with a few other options like a Ra…
On the plus side, mine misdetected a wake word during a funny conversation and said "Sorry, I can't find any area called _____[60 second repeat of funny conversation]___" and it made my family laugh harder than we've laughed in a really long time. I even went into the tts cache and saved the wav b/c it was sooo funny.
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
How about a button? I'd prefer to physically press a button on an intercom box than having something churning away constantly processing sound.
Time for a real life Star Trek comm badge
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's been surprising in my experience regarding the wake word is that it recognizes me (adult male) saying the wake word ~95% of the time. However, it only registers the rest of my family (women and children) ~30% of the time.
I thought all people's voice had to be trained, and if you didn't go through it the match % was much smaller.
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
My lights adjust their brightness and color spectrum automatically throughout the day while also understanding the time of year and sun position. This alone is next level. All are voice/tablet controlled. When I start a movie at night, lights will adjust automatically in my open floor plan first level. All of this operates without me ever having to give any mental energy beyond the initial setup. This is not just fli…
How the hell are you managing that. On a simple micro level I can figure it out, but as a whole over the entire house? o.0
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#137If you're less concerned about privacy, I use Gemini 2.5 Flash for this and it's exceptionally good and fast as a HA assistant while being much cheaper than the electricity that would be needed to keep a 3090 awake. The thing that kills this for me (and they even mentioned it) is wake word detection. I have both the HA voice preview and FPH Satellite1 devices, plus have experimented with a few other options like a Ra…
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#138I almost fainted
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#139I bought a Home Assistant Voice Preview Edition to try out. It's surprisingly good, but still falls short when compared to Google Home speakers: - Wake word detection isn't as good as the Google Homes (more false positives, more false negatives - so I can't just tune sensitivity). - Mic and speakers are both of poor quality in comparison to Google Home devices. - Flow is awkward. On a Google Home device, you can say…
How are you hosting your LLM locally? I tried Ollama on an M4 Mac mini, even with a smaller LLM, the performance was very poor.
Re: My Journey to a reliable and enjoyable locally hosted voice assistant (2025)
#140One that I have been experimenting with is using analog phones (including rotary ones!) to act as the satellites. I live in an older home and have phone jacks in most of the rooms already so I only had to use a single analog telephone adapter. [0] The downside is I don't have wake word support, but it makes it more private and I don't find myself missing my smart speakers that much. At some point I would like to also…
I wish I was remotely closer to being this kind of hacker :(