Live data from Hacker News

Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

macrumors.com

131–140 of 473 posts

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#131
MacBook Neo is going to sell like crazy. In the education market, educators, students, aides... nothing close at this price point. With memory and SSD prices so high I don't see how Dell, Asus and others are going to be able to compete. Unless the build quality is significantly worse than a M1 macbook air not sure budget PC makers will be able to compete.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#132
post #6

does that mean since this is the iPhone 16 cpu, by proxy the iPhone 16 can also run Windows in a virtual machine?

Maybe/maybe not (we don't know how identical the A18 chip is to what shipped in the iPhone) - but it does determine that the virtualization stuff that was added to the M1 (in the era of the A14) has now moved over to the A series, at least enough to support macOS.

Speculation I’ve heard from Ben Thompson of Stratechery is this machine is, in part, a way to get value out of iPhone Pro chips that had defects.

The Neo has a 5 core GPU. The iPhone 16 Pro had a 6 core.

So, if he’s correct, these are the same exact chip. Just with a fault in one GPU core or one GPU core disabled if it was good. That lets them use extra chips they already made that would have gone to waste, at least until they run out.

Which would mean they both would have identical abilities, assuming no software lock for segmentation purposes.

It’s all supposition. But it make a lot of business sense.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#133
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a difference between bloated and batteries included. From a development point of view, macOS has native system libraries for things no other platform seems to include native system libraries for. And by "native system libraries" I do not mean downloadable content, dynamic support or anything similar, even if they're first-party. Though having unremovable system apps for every one of Apple's services MAY count…

The definition of bloat is something that you don’t use, even if someone else does.

There’s a big difference between unnecessary applications taking up space on your storage device, and unnecessary services running in the background competing for RAM and CPU with the applications you actually want to run.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every thread about Windows on Hacker News includes claims about apps taking 30 seconds to launch, web pages taking 20 seconds to load, simple applications being unusable, and other extreme performance problems. These are puzzling for anyone (like me) who uses Windows at home without all of these extreme performance problems. That was until I realized how many reports are coming from people talking about their work la…

I once worked on a computer for the US Government that felt slow. I counted nine (9) directly competitive and redundant endpoint protection products on it. Not nine different/only somewhat overlapping pieces of software from companies that were competitors. Nine equivalent products . I guess defender made ten.

In college I remember one room had some kind of all-in-one PCs built into the desks. It would have been useful.

Except they were unusably slow. Literally.

Log in when class starts, you may get control after 10+ minutes. Opening a web browser was a mistake you may not live to regret.

The network there was not fast. The various security stuff slowed every computer down a lot.

I suspect they were already older and maybe underspec. Probably had 4200 RPM disks or something.

But the combination meant they were 100% worthless.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#135
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Every thread about Windows on Hacker News includes claims about apps taking 30 seconds to launch, web pages taking 20 seconds to load, simple applications being unusable, and other extreme performance problems. These are puzzling for anyone (like me) who uses Windows at home without all of these extreme performance problems. That was until I realized how many reports are coming from people talking about their work la…

Outside corporate setting, it is also the fact that most windows systems you encounter are installed on cheap machines by people who just care that their word processor works a few times a month. And you were probably forced to fix it. At the same time, as someone with a well maintained Windows gaming rig, I don't like spending time in the OS these days. Something about transparently doing stuff that puts money in th…

And Windows laptops are such a commodity business that prices are incredibly low. So PC makers load ‘em up with junk because they get paid for those deals.

They are more incentivized by that than the few lost sales from people who know better to look for low crud machines.

And on more expensive machines they’d just be leaving money on the table. So they still often ship bundled crud.

Similar to spyware on TVs. Margins are razor thin. They’re going to make them up somewhere.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#136
post #123
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Can this tool allow me to run both VMs in an Apple Silicon device in a performant way? I use VMWare Fusion on an M1 Air to run ARM Windows. Windows is then able to run Windows x86-64 executables I believe through it's own Rosetta 2 like implementation. The main limitation is that you cannot use x86-64 drivers. Similarly, ARM Linux VMs can use Rosetta 2 to run x86-64 binaries with excellent performance. For that I m…

Possible catch: Rosetta 2 goes away next year in macOS 27. I don’t know what the story for VMs is. I’d really like to know as it affects me. Sure you can go QEMU, but there’s a real performance hit there.

Not until macOS 28., but you're right, it's frustratingly unclear whether the initial deprecation is limited to macOS apps or whether it will also stop working for VMs.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/102527

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/run...

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reality is most 8GB M1 Macs are still working just fine 6 years later. Power users know they need more than 8GB of RAM and will buy a MacBook Air or Pro with 16GB+. The MacBook neo is for students, grandparents, travel, etc. Hell, even if it dies after 6 years it was still a better experience than using a $500-600 windows PC and the cost comes out to ~$8/month spread over 6 years.

>The reality is most 8GB M1 Macs are still working just fine 6 years later. Do you think SSD drives are replaceable for no reason? Just because M1 mac aren't failing left and right doesn't mean their NAND won't fail. Even though I like the NEO, I can't in good faith buy a machine with soldered wearable parts. That's like buying a car with soldered brake pads because "in 6 years average users don't feel like they need…

Just because it's soldered doesn't mean it can't be replaced.

(But it's encrypted, so you'd better have backups because you can't read it off the chips.)

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#138

MacBook Neo is going to sell like crazy. In the education market, educators, students, aides... nothing close at this price point. With memory and SSD prices so high I don't see how Dell, Asus and others are going to be able to compete. Unless the build quality is significantly worse than a M1 macbook air not sure budget PC makers will be able to compete.

ITs going to sell like crazy not because of specs, but because its apple, and its a cheap. Cause god forbid you pull out a chromebook in a starbucks and be seen as a peasant.

If you know what you are doing and don't want to spend a lot of money, its really not that hard to buy a refurbished thinkpad, swap in more ram, and install your linux disro of choice, for a lower price and get very similar usable performance.

Re: Parallels confirms MacBook Neo can run Windows in a virtual machine

#140
post #13

Funnily it probably runs Windows better than the typical corporate spyware burdened x86 laptop.

Wouldn't corporate spyware equally burden the NEO? Especially more give the 8GB of RAM vs 16+ on X64 laptops? Chrome, Teams, IDEs, websites etc are equally bloated on both platforms.

Yep.

A Neo will win a race with a similar speed Windows computer full of bundled crap and security slop.

But it would work the other way around too.

The nice thing about Macs is even if you see a lot of what Apple puts on the computers as useless trash (“Why the hell do I need iBooks?”) it’s not stuff running in the background interfering with everything you do the way bad PC security software bundled on cheap Windows PCs or forced by corporate often does.

I can tell you my last work Mac slowed down noticeably (though not too bad, luckily) the day they decided to put the corporate security crud on it.

The newer security crud we use now seems much better behaved though.

Post reply on HN