So, DoD has done what it said it would. And OpenAI has jumped on the opportunity. I'm curious what'll openai signatories on notdivided.org do now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188473 Remain undivided in spirit while grinding for OpenAI?
Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
131–140 of 319 posts
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#132Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#133Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Work is not good per-se.
Oh you’ll still work. As a supplicant on your hands and knees for your capitalist overlords.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#135Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#136Does anyone know which law firm is representing anthropic?
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#137Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#138[flagged]
> “Supply chain risk” means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system (see 10 U.S.C. 3252).
Naming a US company a "supply chain risk" is basically saying "this company is an adversary of the USA", which is FUCKING INSANE.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh you’ll still work. As a supplicant on your hands and knees for your capitalist overlords.
If we could move past the empty rhetoric? It turns out a working economy requires well paid workers because somebody needs to buy shit Even "capitalist overlords" (why not "evil bourgeois swine", while we're here) realize that. The "all SWE replaced" jabbering is a sales pitch to the uninformed. I.e. it's more P.T. Barnum than Jay Gould.
Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk
#140So that’s most of sp500 and their providers?