Live data from Hacker News

Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

wsj.com

131–140 of 319 posts

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#131
post #69

So, DoD has done what it said it would. And OpenAI has jumped on the opportunity. I'm curious what'll openai signatories on notdivided.org do now - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47188473 Remain undivided in spirit while grinding for OpenAI?

"jumped on the opportunity" is possible, but per https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-whole-thing-was-scam it's plausible that OpenAI created this situation through straightforward bribery.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#133
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And 32% of eligible voters that thought Kamala would've been worse.

Don't blame the voters, they didn't get to pick her and did not run her campaign.

Oh no, I will. They're absolutely culpable.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Work is not good per-se.

Oh you’ll still work. As a supplicant on your hands and knees for your capitalist overlords.

This is nonsense, you can’t fire an AI and an AI will never take credit nor will it take responsibility. Humans will always be in charge, because you will never be able to completely trust an AI, because it has no skin in the game, literally.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#138

[flagged]

The legal definition of supply chain risk:

> “Supply chain risk” means the risk that an adversary may sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function, or otherwise subvert the design, integrity, manufacturing, production, distribution, installation, operation, or maintenance of a covered system so as to surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade the function, use, or operation of such system (see 10 U.S.C. 3252).

Naming a US company a "supply chain risk" is basically saying "this company is an adversary of the USA", which is FUCKING INSANE.

Re: Pentagon formally labels Anthropic supply-chain risk

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh you’ll still work. As a supplicant on your hands and knees for your capitalist overlords.

If we could move past the empty rhetoric? It turns out a working economy requires well paid workers because somebody needs to buy shit Even "capitalist overlords" (why not "evil bourgeois swine", while we're here) realize that. The "all SWE replaced" jabbering is a sales pitch to the uninformed. I.e. it's more P.T. Barnum than Jay Gould.

People need to buy food. Are farmers well paid?
Post reply on HN