Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well actually there is ROE.md, no code, just a Markdown file to generate a claw.
The code is always generated using the latest LLM, ensuring that it takes advantage of the latest architectures and programming language features.
NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
131–140 of 146 posts
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#132I can't believe the solution is creating uncompatibile branch and forcing users to use cladue for resolving merge conflits. Why not bake in the dual compatibility?
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#133Can someone explain the special sauce of the claws compared to just use claude.ai etc
Thats it. Its just pets.com
Edit: although as a counterpoint to my cynicism, just the intgreations and deamon-ness can be a game changer if the user experience is good. Thats the critical thing. If you can actually delegate tasks to it and not worry about them then it'd be great. But if your gonna have to worry if its done properly, or that it would delete your emails, then it doesnt work yet. But the dream of a robot assistant is inviting. I just dont think the underlying AI is there yet
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no special sauce, it's mass hysteria driven by fake adoption metrics and people who don't know anything about computers who let "agents" run free on theirs. It's the equivalent of showing a magician cut a women in a box in half to a 5 years old kid... Put them in the same category as the neckbeards getting a hard on every 3 weeks for the past 2 years when they get to see the new version of ThE PeLiCaN On A B…
I've found real utility in it, but the hype definitely exceeds the current capabilities
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#135Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#136For my version of the AI assistant, I used a Docker container and Unix permissions: https://github.com/skorokithakis/stavrobot All plugins run in one Docker container, but they're isolated from each other by different *nix users, so they can't read each other's files. That's much more lightweight, and you don't have to run one container per plugin. Crucially, plugins can't read each other's secrets or modify each oth…
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would love to hear more about this!
I haven't written it up yet but the repo is here: It's just a MEMS mic, a battery, and an ESP32, very simple but it works amazingly well. I wrote a companion Android app for it and it works extremely reliably!
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't written it up yet but the repo is here: It's just a MEMS mic, a battery, and an ESP32, very simple but it works amazingly well. I wrote a companion Android app for it and it works extremely reliably!
I really love that. Can't wait for your writeup!
Sneak peek: https://imgz.org/i6xDDz6x/
Re: NanoClaw moved from Apple Containers to Docker
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
I haven't written it up yet but the repo is here: It's just a MEMS mic, a battery, and an ESP32, very simple but it works amazingly well. I wrote a companion Android app for it and it works extremely reliably!
Are you running NanoClaw or a different project?