Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

boxc.net

131–140 of 223 posts

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#131
post #22

> Reduce your expectations about speed and performance! Wildly understating this part. Even the best local models (ones you run on beefy 128GB+ RAM machines) get nowhere close to the sheer intelligence of Claude/Gemini/Codex. At worst these models will move you backwards and just increase the amount of work Claude has to do when your limits reset.

I agree. You could spin for 100 hours on a sub-par model or get it done in 10 minutes with a frontier model

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The best open models such as Kimi 2.5 are about as smart today as the big proprietary models were one year ago. That's not "nothing" and is plenty good enough for everyday work.

The article mentions https://unsloth.ai/docs/basics/claude-codex I'll add on https://unsloth.ai/docs/models/qwen3-coder-next The full model is supposedly comparable to Sonnet 4.5 But, you can run the 4 bit quant on consumer hardware as long as your RAM + VRAM has room to hold 46GB. 8 bit needs 85.

[deleted]

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The best open models such as Kimi 2.5 are about as smart today as the big proprietary models were one year ago. That's not "nothing" and is plenty good enough for everyday work.

Which takes a $20k thunderbolt cluster of 2 512GB RAM Mac Studio Ultras to run at full quality…

Depending on what your usage requirements are, Mac Minis running UMA over RDMA is becoming a feasible option. At roughly 1/10 of the cost you're getting much much more than 1/10 the performance. (YMMV)

https://buildai.substack.com/i/181542049/the-mac-mini-moment

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#134
post #4
post #3

Useful tip. From a strategic standpoint of privacy, cost and control, I immediately went for local models, because that allowed to baseline tradeoffs and it also made it easier to understand where vendor lock-in could happen, or not get too narrow in perspective (e.g. llama.cpp/open router depending on local/cloud [1] ). With the explosion of popularity of CLI tools (claude/continue/codex/kiro/etc) it still makes sen…

can you recommend a setup with ollama and a cli tool? Do you know if I need a licence for Claude if I only use my own local LLM?

You must try GLM4.7 and KimiK2.5 !

I also highly suggest OpenCode. You'll get the same Claude Code vibe.

If your computer is not beefy enough to run them locally, Synthetic is a bless when it comes to providing these models, their team is responsive, no downtime or any issue for the last 6 months.

Full list of models provided : https://dev.synthetic.new/docs/api/models

Referal link if you're interested in trying it for free, and discount for the first month : https://synthetic.new/?referral=kwjqga9QYoUgpZV

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#135
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah this is why I ended up getting Claude subscription in the first place. I was using GLM on ZAI coding plan (jerry rigged Claude Code for $3/month), but finding myself asking Sonnet to rewrite 90% of the code GLM was giving me. At some point I was like "what the hell am I doing" and just switched. To clarify, the code I was getting before mostly worked, it was just a lot less pleasant to look at and work with. Mig…

> but finding myself asking Sonnet to rewrite 90% of the code GLM was giving me. At some point I was like "what the hell am I doing" and just switched. This is a very common sequence of events. The frontier hosted models are so much better than everything else that it's not worth messing around with anything lesser if doing this professionally. The $20/month plans go a long way if context is managed carefully. For a…

what tools / processes do you use to manage context

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#137

[flagged]

I would always prefer something local. By definition it's more secure, as you are not sending your code on the wire to a third party server, and hope that they comply with the "We will not train our models with your data".

Re: Claude Code: connect to a local model when your quota runs out

#140
post #60
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Correct, a rack full of datacenter equipment is not going to compete with anything that fits on your desk or lap. Well spotted. But as a counterpoint: there are whole communities of people in this space who get significant value from models they run locally. I am one of them.

What do you use local models for? I'm asking generally about possible applications of these smaller models

Well for starters you get a real guarantee of privacy.

If you’re worried about others being able to clone your business processes if you share them with a frontier provider then the cost of a Mac Studio to run Kimi is probably a justifiable tax right off.

Post reply on HN