Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Regular people hate numbers What does this even mean
Most people are dumb as rocks and ux/ui is built around that fact.
ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
131–140 of 171 posts
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like an easy browser extension
Extensions can steal data. https://www.pcmag.com/news/uninstall-now-these-chrome-browse... It's irresponsible for OpenAI to let this issue be solved by extensions.
Also, they're easy to write for simple fixes rather than having to find, vet, and then install a regular extension that brings 600lbs of other stuff.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#133Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Regular people hate numbers What does this even mean
Most people are dumb as rocks and ux/ui is built around that fact.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#135My guess is that including timestamps in messages to the LLM will bias the LLMs responses in material ways, and ways they don't want, and showing timestamps to users but not the LLM will create confusion when the user assumes the LLM is aware of them but it isn't. So the simple product management decision was to just leave them out.
I could definitely see that being an issue, but like with so many UX decisions, I wish they would at least hide the option somewhere in a settings menu. I also don't think it would be impossible to give the LLM access to the timestamps through a tool call, so it's not constantly polluting the chat context.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Regular people hate numbers What does this even mean
It's something extremely pervasive in modern design language. It actually infuriates me to no end. There are many many many instances where you should use numbers but we get vague bullshit descriptions instead. My classic example is that Samsung phones show charging as Slow, Fast, Very fast, Super fast charging. They could just use watts like a sane person. Internally of course everything is actually watts and variou…
Like you, I don't buy the argument that people are actually too dumb to deal with the latter or are allergic to numbers. People get used to and make use of numbers in context naturally if you expose them.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#137I would also love to see a token budget use for the chats -- to know when the model is about to run out of context. It's crazy this is not there.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#138The only (silly) reason I can think of is that a non trivial number of people copy pasta directly from chatgpt responses and having the timestamp there would be annoying.
Yeah, that's a valid point though some text on a page can easily be made unselectable via css (html?). I think through user-select
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#139They also don’t support code formatting of inputs. You’d think after 3 years out whatever theyd have resolved that.
The painful slowness of long chats (especially in thinking mode for some reason) demonstrates this.
Re: ChatGPT conversations still lack timestamps after years of requests
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
this is actually hilarious, also easily fixable if they just respond to that with a pre-determined if response == 'thank you': print('your welcome')
That won't work if the previous conversation was something like "translate everything from here on into ".