Earlier quoted context omitted.
I alluded to it in my comment but let me make it even more clear There is significantly less hiring for roles that AI can replace easily compared to roles that it can't replace easily If there was decreased hiring simply because of the economy then why would it only be impacting certain job roles? Hmm... Mystery...
Have you given thought to the fact that there is an overlap between "jobs easily replaced by AI" and "jobs that are easy to consolidate into existing roles", or even "non-essential jobs"?
I think you are on to something here. AI is what gives people the ability to consolidate many roles into one.
Like in my example, when I fired my front-end developer, I now can easily do that task.
Or, a marketing generalist can now create blog posts using ChatGPT instead of needing to also have a content writer
To your point about "non-essential": "Front-end development" is not necessarily something I would consider non-essential, but maybe "front-end developer" is now. Something to think about