Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m confused. Bounties for security holes make sense because you don’t need to submit the patch, just find the hole. And bounties for open source (like in this case) also make sense because you have everything you need to submit a patch. But for everything else (like big tech, startups, and so on) bounties can’t fix bugs because even if I find a bug, how am I going to patch it without access to the source code? How c…
You can fix bugs without source lots of ways, although many are arcane and finicky. An example of a healthy and productive ecosystem for this is in game modding. Sometimes this relies on vendor supplied tools (like a modkit, e.g. Elder Scrolls games), messing with bytecode directly (Minecraft until recently), or some cooperation from the vendor (Dwarf Fortress). In all of those cases users/players were able to fix bu…
The parent seems to be talking about the companies using bug bounties as a way to fix bugs in their software and the fixes becoming part of that software (not a separate mod run on top).