Earlier quoted context omitted.
> annoying enough having to switch from one LLM ecosystem to another all the time due to vague usage restrictions I use KiloCode and what I find amazing is that it'll be working on a problem and then a message will come up about needing to topup the money in my account to continue (or switch to a free model), so I switch to a free model (currently their Code Supernova 1million context) and it doesn't miss a beat and…
Models are stateless, why would that not work?
Claude Haiku 4.5
131–140 of 292 posts
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m surprised none of the frontier model companies have thrown this test in as an Easter egg.
simonw has other prompts, that are undisclosed. So cheating on this prompt will be catched.
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#133I just don't find the benchmarks on the site here at all believable. codex for me with gpt-5 is so much better then claude any model version. I mean maybe it's because they compare to gpt-5-codex model but they don't mention is that high, medium, low, etc... so it's just misleading probably... but i must reiterate zero loyalty to any AI vendor. 100% what solves the problem more consistently and of a higher quality an…
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Models are stateless, why would that not work?
OK I understand what those words mean, but how exactly does that work? How does the new model 'know' what's being worked on when the old model was in the middle of working on a task and then a new model is switched to? (and where the task might be modifying a C++ file)
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Models are stateless, why would that not work?
OK I understand what those words mean, but how exactly does that work? How does the new model 'know' what's being worked on when the old model was in the middle of working on a task and then a new model is switched to? (and where the task might be modifying a C++ file)
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Update, Haiku 4.5 is not just very targeted in terms of changes but also really fast. Averaging at 220token/sec is almost double most other models I'd consider comparable (though again, far to early to make a proper judgement) and if this can be kept up, that is a massive value add over other models. That is nearly Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite speed for context. Yes, we got Groq and Cerebras getting up to 1000token/sec, but…
Where do you get the 220 token/second? Genuinely curious as that would be very impressive for a model comparable to sonnet 4. OpenRouter currently publishing around 116/tps[1] [1] https://openrouter.ai/anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5
A few examples, prompted at UTC 21:30-23:00 via T3 Chat [0]:
Prompt 1 — 120.65 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/tgqp1dr0la
Prompt 2 — 118.58 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/86d93w093a
Prompt 3 — 203.20 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/h39nct9fp5
Prompt 4 — 91.43 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/mqu1edzffq
Prompt 5 — 167.66 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/gingktrf2m
Prompt 6 — 161.51 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/qg6uxkdgy0
Prompt 7 — 168.11 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/qiutu67ebc
Prompt 8 — 203.68 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/zziplhpw0d
Prompt 9 — 102.86 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/s3hldh5nxs
Prompt 10 — 174.66 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/dyyfyc458m
Prompt 11 — 199.07 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/7t29sx87cd
Prompt 12 — 82.13 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/5ati3nvvdx
Prompt 13 — 94.96 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/q3ig7k117z
Prompt 14 — 190.02 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/hp5kjeujy7
Prompt 15 — 190.16 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/77vs6yxcfa
Prompt 16 — 92.45 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/i0qrsvp29i
Prompt 17 — 190.26 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/berx0aq3qo
Prompt 18 — 187.31 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/0wyuk0zzfc
Prompt 19 — 204.31 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/6vuawveaqu
Prompt 20 — 135.55 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/b0a11i4gfq
Prompt 21 — 208.97 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/al54aha9zk
Prompt 22 — 188.07 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/wu3k8q67qc
Prompt 23 — 198.17 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/0bt1qrynve
Prompt 24 — 196.25 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/nhnmp0hlc5
Prompt 25 — 185.09 token/sec — https://t3.chat/share/ifh6j4d8t5
I ran each prompt three times and got (within expected variance meaning less than 5% plus or minus) the same token/sec results for the respective prompt. Each used Claude Haiku 4.5 with "High reasoning". Will continue testing, but this is beyond odd. I will add that my very early evals leaned heavily into pure code output, where 200 token/sec is consistently possible at the moment, but it is certainly not the average as claimed before, there I was mistaken. That being said, even across a wider range of challenges, we are above 160 token/sec and if you solely focus on coding, whether Rust or React, Haiku 4.5 is very swift.
[0] Normally not using T3 Chat for evals, just easier to share prompts this way, though was disappointed to find that the model information (token/sec, TTF, etc.) can't be enabled without an account. Also, these aren't the prompts I usually use for evals. Those I try to keep somewhat out of training by only using paid for API for benchmarks. As anything on Hacker News is most assuredly part of model training, I decided to write some quick and dirty prompts to highlight what I have been seeing.
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#137Pretty cute pelican on a slightly dodgy bicycle: https://tools.simonwillison.net/svg-render#%3Csvg%20viewBox%...
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Models are stateless, why would that not work?
OK I understand what those words mean, but how exactly does that work? How does the new model 'know' what's being worked on when the old model was in the middle of working on a task and then a new model is switched to? (and where the task might be modifying a C++ file)
curl https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-H "x-api-key: $(llm keys get anthropic)" \
-H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
-d '{
"model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
"max_tokens": 1024,
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "What is the capital of France?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "The capital of France is Paris."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Germany?"
},
{
"role": "assistant",
"content": "The capital of Germany is Berlin."
},
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Belgium?"
}
]
}'
You can see this yourself if you use their APIs.Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#139Pretty cute pelican on a slightly dodgy bicycle: https://tools.simonwillison.net/svg-render#%3Csvg%20viewBox%...
Re: Claude Haiku 4.5
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Models are stateless, why would that not work?
OK I understand what those words mean, but how exactly does that work? How does the new model 'know' what's being worked on when the old model was in the middle of working on a task and then a new model is switched to? (and where the task might be modifying a C++ file)