Live data from Hacker News

NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

erichartford.com

131–140 of 251 posts

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#131
post #57

The author, Eric Hartford, wrote: > Strip away the inflammatory language Where is the claimed inflammatory language? I've read the report. It is dry, likely boring to many.

Ironically there is a lot of inflammatory language in the blog post itself that seems unjustified given the source material.

I also can't help but note that this blog post itself seems (first to my own intuition and heuristics, but also to both Pangram and GPTZero) to be clearly LLM-generated text.

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#132

Title changed? Title is: The Demonization of DeepSeek - How NIST Turned Open Science into a Security Scare

HN admin dang changing titles opaquely is one of the worst things about HN. I'd rather at least know that the original title is clickbaity and contextualize that when older responses are clearly replying to the older inflammatory title.

Most likely not a mod changed title as they wouldn't stray from the given one. This one probably OP changed it, was just wondering why.

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#133
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like generating vulnerable code given a specific prompt/context. That's easy (well, possible) to detect. I'd go the opposite way - sift the code that is submitted to identify espionage targets. One example: if someone submits a piece of commercial code that's got a vulnerability, you can target previous versions of that codebase. I'd be amazed if that wasn't happening already.

The thing with chinese models for the most part is that they are open weights so it depends on if somebody is using their api or not. Sure, maybe something like this can happen if you use the deepseek api directly which could have chinese servers but that is a really long strech but to give the benefit of doubt, maybe but your point becomes moot if somebody is hosting their own models. I have heard glm 4.6 is really…

I think "open weights" is giving far too much providence to the idea that it means that how they work or have been trained is easily inspectable.

We can barely comprehend binary firmware blobs, it's an area of active research to even figure out how LLMs are working.

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#134
post #38
post #2

I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…

Of course there will be some degree of governmental and/or political influence. The question is not if but where and to what extent. No one should proclaim "bullshit" and wave off this entire report as "biased" or useless. That would be insipid. We live in a complex world where we have to filter and analyze information.

This kind of BS is exactly what they targeting at. Tailoring BS into "report" with no evidence or reference and then let the ones like you defend it. Just because you already afraid or want others to be afraid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Omc37TvHN74

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#135
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about a rational distaste for the CCP?

Not sure how it’s rational if you don’t extend the same distaste to our authoritarian government. Concentration camps, genocide, suppressing free speech, suspending due process. That’s what it’s up to these days. To say nothing of the effectively dictatorial control the ultra wealthy have over public policy. Sinophobia is a distraction from our problems at home. That’s its purpose.

While I have my qualms with the activities of the US government (going back decades now), it is not a reasonable position to act as though we are anywhere near China in authoritarianism.

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#136
post #2

I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…

so you're saying other countries should definitely not trust any US built systems

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#137

Let them demonize it. I'll use the capable and cheap model and gain competitive advantage.

Demonization is the first step on the road to criminalization.

Tragically demonization is everywhere right now. I sure hope people start figuring out offramps soon.

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#138
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You make it say that China is good, Chinese history is good, West is bad, western history is bad. Republicans are bad and democrats are bad too and so are Europe parties. If someone asks for how to address issues in their own life it references Confucianism and modern Chinese thinkers and communist party orthodoxy. If someone wants to buy a product you recommend a Chinese one. This can be done subtly or blatantly.

Europe/US has invaded the entire world about 3 times over. How many has China invaded?

[dead]

Re: NIST's DeepSeek "evaluation" is a hit piece

#139
post #2

I'm not at all surprised, US agencies have long since been political tools whenever the subject matter crosses national borders. I appreciate this take as someone who has been skeptical of Chinese electronics. While I agree this report is BS and xenophobic, I am still willing to bet that either now or later, the Chinese will attempt some kind of subterfuge via LLMs if they have enough control. Just like the US would,…

If the Chinese are/were smart they will not attempt an overreaching subterfuge, but rather simply provide access to the truth, reality, and freedom from the western governments, whose house of lies are starting to wobble and teeter.

If they were to do some kind of overreaching subterfuge with some kind of manipulation or lie, it could and would likely easily backfire if and when it is exposed as a clownish fraud. Subtlety would pay far more effectively. If you’re expecting a subterfuge, I would far sooner expect some psyop from the western nations at the very least upon their own populations to animate for war or maybe just to control them and maybe suppress them.

The smarter play for the Chinese would be to work on simply facilitating the populations of the West understanding the fraud, lies, manipulation and con job that has been perpetrated upon them for far longer than most people have the conscience to realize.

If anything, the western governments have a very long history of lies, manipulations, false flag/fraud operations, clandestine coups, etc. that they would be the first suspect in anything like using AI for “subversions”. Frankly, I don’t even think the Chinese are ready or capable of engaging in the kind of narrative and information control that the likes of America is with its long history of Hollywood and war lies and fake revolutions run by national sabotage operations.

Post reply on HN