Google is making harder and harder to depend on their software.
Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
131–140 of 236 posts
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm still shocked that my google voice number still functions after all these years. It makes me assume it's main purpose is to actually be an honeypot of some sort, maybe for spam call detection.
Another shocking story to share. I have a tiny service built on top of Google App Engine that (only) I use personally. I made it 15+ years ago, and the last time I deployed changes was 10+ years ago. It's still running. I have no idea why.
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fix that at the presentation layer (PDFs and Word files etc support links) not the data one.
Let me know when you figure out how to make a printed scientific journal clickable.
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#134I have only given this a moment's thought, but why not just publish the URL map as a text file or SQLLite DB? So at least we know where they went? I don't think it would be a privacy issue since the links are all public?
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#135About 60k academic citations about to die - https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=90&q=%22https://goo... Countless books with irrevocably broken references - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22://goo.gl%22&sca_upv=1&sc... And for what? The cost of keeping a few TB online and a little bit of CPU power? An absolute act of cultural vandalism.
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#136About 60k academic citations about to die - https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=90&q=%22https://goo... Countless books with irrevocably broken references - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22://goo.gl%22&sca_upv=1&sc... And for what? The cost of keeping a few TB online and a little bit of CPU power? An absolute act of cultural vandalism.
https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/Goo.gl https://tracker.archiveteam.org/goo-gl/ (1.66B work items remaining as of this comment) How to run an ArchiveTeam warrior: https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/ArchiveTeam_Warrior (edit: i see jaydenmilne commented about this further down thread, mea culpa)
I wanted to help and did that using VMware.
For curious people, here is what the UI looks like, you have a list of projects to choose, I choose the goo.gl project, and a "Current project" tab which shows the project activity.
Project list: https://imgur.com/a/peTVzyw
Current project: https://imgur.com/a/QVuWWIj
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Adding an external service so you don’t have to store a few hundred bytes is wild, particularly within a pdf.
It's not the bytes. It's the fact that it's likely gonna be printed in a paper journal, where you can't click the link.
This use case of "I have a paper journal and no PDF but a computer with a web browser" seems extraordinarily contrived. I have literally held a single-digit number of printed papers in my entire life while looking at thousands as PDFs. If we cared, we'd use a QR code.
This kind of luddite behavior sometimes makes using this site exhausting.
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let me know when you figure out how to make a printed scientific journal clickable.
Take a photo on your phone, OS recognises the link in the image, makes it clickable, done. Or, use a QR code instead
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
If Cloudflare provides the infra (thanks Cloudflare!), I am happy to have them provide the compute and network for the lookups (which, at their scale, is probably a rounding error), with the Internet Archive remaining the storage system of last resort. Is that different than the Internet Archive offering compute to provide the lookups on top of their storage system? Everything is temporary, intent is important, etc.…
This is much better positioned for longevity than google’s URL shortener, I’m not trying to make that argument. My point is that 10-15 years ago, when Google’s URL shortener was being adopted for all these (inappropriate) uses, its use was supported by a public opinion of Google’s ‘inevitability’. For Perma, CF serves a similar function.
Re: Google's shortened goo.gl links will stop working next month
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Adding an external service so you don’t have to store a few hundred bytes is wild, particularly within a pdf.
It's not the bytes. It's the fact that it's likely gonna be printed in a paper journal, where you can't click the link.