Live data from Hacker News

Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

machinelearning.apple.com

131–140 of 210 posts

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#131
post #79
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First, most of the English speaking world is not native. "As of 2022, there were about 400 million native speakers of English. Including people who speak English as a second language, estimates of the total number of Anglophones vary from 1.5 billion to 2 billion." Second, all popular models I tested did well with that query, including Gemini on Android (aka "ok Google"), except Apple's. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wi…

I am not sure why you go on the subject of English speaking world etc. Anyway, the models you tested with that query, which I am not sure why we think is a good benchmark, are local models running on a wireless device or they use datacenter and only convey the text back and forth?

I'm fairly sure Siri still sends user voice samples to a data center. At least for a while, it used to use multipath TCP to decrease latency over multiple available network connections if I'm not misremembering.

Some modern Apple devices support "local Siri", but it's a limited subset of both voice recognition performance and capabilities.

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#132

Every time I see a paper from Apple I just feel like, OK so why isn’t my iPhone actually doing any of this yet? Why give this to developers if you haven’t been able to get Siri to use it yet? Does it not work or something? I guess we’ll find out when devs start trying to make stuff

> why isn’t my iPhone actually doing any of this yet? What exactly are you referring to? Models do run on iPhone and there are features that take advantage of it, today.

Yes, but why do I have to open a third-party app to do these things when Apple, the company that primarily popularized the entire genre of mobile voice assistants, could very feasibly bake all of that into theirs?

I mean, the thing even lets me ask ChatGPT things if I explicitly ask it to! But why do I need to ask in the first place?

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"You haven't contorted your comically simple query enough to make the brittle tool work. Throw the chicken bones better next time."

It’s been this way for over a decade. If someone hasn’t figured it out by now, that’s kind of on them. I’m not even sure why those two things would be asked as a single question. It seems like a very unnatural way to pose those two questions. Most humans would trip on that, especially if it was asked verbally.

OP isn't asking how to use Siri to do his contrived task. OP is saying that Siri in 2025 should be able to handle that relatively simple albeit contrived task.

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#134
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It does. You can use it directly on iOS 26 beta - without writing a line of code I can toy with the on-device model through Shortcuts on my 16 Pro. It’s not meant to be a general purpose chatbot… but it can work as a general purpose chatbot in airplane mode which is a novel experience. https://share.icloud.com/photos/018AYAPEm06ALXciiJAsLGyuA https://share.icloud.com/photos/0f9IzuYQwmhLIcUIhIuDiudFw The above took li…

It would be interesting to see the tok/s comparison between the ANE and GPU for inference. I bet these small models are a lot friendlier than the 7B/12B models that technically fit on a phone but won't accelerate well without a GPU.

fitting 7B model on phone with 8gb ram for the whole system is impressive.

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#135

Every time I see a paper from Apple I just feel like, OK so why isn’t my iPhone actually doing any of this yet? Why give this to developers if you haven’t been able to get Siri to use it yet? Does it not work or something? I guess we’ll find out when devs start trying to make stuff

> why isn’t my iPhone actually doing any of this yet? Probably Apple is trying to distill the models so they can run on your phone locally . Remember, most, if not all, of Siri is running on your device. There's no round trip whatsoever for voice processing. Also, for larger models, there will be throwaway VMs per request, so building that infra takes time.

They just launched "Private Cloud Compute" with much fanfare to enable server-side LLM processing, so between that and the fact that Siri has been server-based for most of its existence (local processing is fairly new), I don't think that's their main constraint at this point.

That said, "Private Cloud Compute" does run on proprietary Apple hardware, so availability might be a concern (assuming they don't want to start charging for it).

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To use their APIs at a discount, so what?

Apple aren’t paying OpenAI anything: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-12/apple-to-...

The art of the deal

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#137
post #99
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What’s the cost of pointing it to Private Cloud Compute? It can’t be free, can it?

It’s “free”, as in it doesn’t charge you anything or require a subscription: it’s a part of Apple Intelligence which is basically something bought with the device. It’s in the cloud so theoretically one shouldn’t need a quite new iPhone or Mac but - one does.

[deleted]

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#138
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's fine if you want to, but I think they should consider that basically nobody is reading it. If it was important for society, photo apps would prompt you to embed it in the image like EXIF. Computer vision is getting good enough to generate it; it has to be, because real-world objects don't have alt text.

I actually use Claude to generate the first draft of most of my alt text, but I still do a manual review of it because LLMs usually don't have enough contents to fully understand the message I'm trying to convey with an image: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/2/accessibility-and-gen-a...

Context not content.

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> why isn’t my iPhone actually doing any of this yet? What exactly are you referring to? Models do run on iPhone and there are features that take advantage of it, today.

None of those features are in any way interesting though. Image playground is a joke, Siri is a joke, that generative emoji thing is a joke. The AI stuff with photography sure, but that’s more like machine learning. The photo touch up thing is… useable? Sometimes? What is it you’ve been so impressed with?

> why isn’t my iPhone doing any of this yet?

> Ok its doing it in 4 or 5 products, but thats a joke.

Not every AI product is a chatbot.

Re: Apple Intelligence Foundation Language Models Tech Report 2025

#140
post #27

> We believe in training our models using diverse and high-quality data. This includes data that we’ve licensed from publishers, curated from publicly available or open- sourced datasets, and publicly available information crawled by our web-crawler, Applebot. > We do not use our users’ private personal data or user interactions when training our foundation models. Additionally, we take steps to apply filters to remo…

When Apple inevitably partners with OpenAI or Anthropic, which by their definition isnt doing "ethical crawling", I wonder how I should be reading that.

[dead]
Post reply on HN