Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If the US is in the wrong, why should I as a citizen not want our government officials held accountable?
The ICC is a cool idea in theory. The implementation pretty much causes human rights violations.
131–140 of 407 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
If the US is in the wrong, why should I as a citizen not want our government officials held accountable?
The ICC is a cool idea in theory. The implementation pretty much causes human rights violations.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not appropriate for an international court that we’re not even a part of to put our Presidents and their subordinates on trial, nor is it something we should meekly concede to.
Why not? Someone has to do it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
50% of people do not support this. That’s a made up number. Trump has barely over 40%. He is an unpopular criminal who has shown time and again he will break the law. What even makes you think a criminal like this would win an election fairly?
Trump won the majority vote in an election that brought out a huge amount of voters compared to previous elections, and Republicans won every other government body. He's not unpopular and many people do support him, unfortunately. Best case scenario, the silent majority didn't bother to prevent Trump and his lackeys from taking over the American government. I don't think denying Trump's popularity is going to solve a…
Perhaps Europe should try building their own tech industry so they have fewer problems like this.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US continues to burn its soft power capital to defend Israel - this guy was only targeted because of his investigations on Israeli war crimes.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It doesn't need to throw out the baby with the (US-controlled) bathwater. The EU should present Microsoft with an ultimatum similar to what China might: setup a non-controlled european licensee to own and manage all MS & Azure infrastructure in the region, or have some legislators force a similar structure on them. Complete control, full sourcecode, EU-only support/access - as a condition for corp HQ being allowed to…
the problem the EU has is that such an ultimatum lacks teeth. China gets to make these demands because they've down willingness to fund and build homegrown alternatives and then blacklist the foreign competitor. If the EU wants the leverage to make these sorts of demands, they need to start by giving out a couple million here and there for the competitors they want to see.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Israel is not a proxy state, they self-determine oftentimes against what their allies have wanted them to do.
for the sake of understanding your position, could you provide some examples? to me it doesn’t seem clear that israeli foreign policy is far removed from US foreign policy or even in contention. The way we vote at the UNSC proves our support for some of the most grotesque of actions - deliberately killing infants and children. Their recent preemptive strike on Iran is, imo, further evidence of that proxy status.
Unfortunately for the US, we’re stuck with what Israel decides to do. A lot of Americans are in favor of supporting Israel for one reason or another. If Irsael is somehow controlling the United States via lobbying or whatever, that kind of invalidates the whole client state idea.
US is the most powerful country in the world but that doesn’t mean we directly control our allies as client states.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not appropriate for an international court that we’re not even a part of to put our Presidents and their subordinates on trial, nor is it something we should meekly concede to.
Was Germany a part of any such treaty? Or was it inappropriate for those Nazis to be held accountable for their crimes?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s not appropriate for an international court that we’re not even a part of to put our Presidents and their subordinates on trial, nor is it something we should meekly concede to.
Was Germany a part of any such treaty? Or was it inappropriate for those Nazis to be held accountable for their crimes?