Live data from Hacker News

Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

reviews.ofb.biz

131–140 of 801 posts

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#131

> I am not suggesting Apple has fallen behind Windows or Android. Changing a setting on Windows 11 can often involve a journey through three or four different interface designs, artifacts of half-implemented changes dating back to the last century. Whenever I find myself stuck outside of Appleland, I am eager to return “home,” flaws and all. Hard agree with this. I sometimes have to boot up a windows laptop to play M…

[dead]

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#132
post #10

There are some factual "gaps" there about how good Snow Leopard was, but I understand the sentiment. As someone who's been a Mac user since System 6 and has been consistently using Macs alongside PCs _daily_ for over 20 years I can say that Apple's software quality (either in terms of polish or just plain QA) has steadily decreased. It's just that me and other old-time switchers have stopped complaining about it and…

I can't believe I'm saying it, but I agree with you about GNOME being my forever desktop. I used to really make fun of GNOME during the 2->3 transition, which seemed so profoundly misguided, but now I love it. I don't know if they've massively improved it or if my perspective has just changed with time.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#134
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Minor nitpick about early OS X There was no acceleration (even 2D!) until 10.2

Well, actually, there was. I was doing OpenGL stuff at the time on a Bondi iMac that barely ran early OS X and distinctly remember that.

Mac OS X versions before Jaguar supported GPU accelerated applications, but the windows were composited in software which caused severe performance problems. Jaguar introduced something called Quartz Extreme, where the windows are treated as OpenGL surfaces and the window contents are textures mapped onto the surfaces. This made OS X significantly smoother on computers with a fast enough GPU and enough VRAM to support it, as the CPU didn't have to spend a bunch of time copying all the window contents to the framebuffer.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#135

> I am not suggesting Apple has fallen behind Windows or Android. Changing a setting on Windows 11 can often involve a journey through three or four different interface designs, artifacts of half-implemented changes dating back to the last century. Whenever I find myself stuck outside of Appleland, I am eager to return “home,” flaws and all. Hard agree with this. I sometimes have to boot up a windows laptop to play M…

How come you have to use Windows to play Minecraft? Are you using Bedrock edition?

Hey, if we're already complaining about Microsoft products, can someone explain why the Bedrock and Java versions of Minecraft have not been made cross-compatible in the TEN YEARS since the Mojang acquisition?

(... speaking as another dad just trying to play with my kid.)

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#136
This alone says a lot about Apple's software "prowess", i.e perennial customer hostility combined with clear incompetence, (in which their "core" customer base has by now becomes participants in some kind of Stockholm syndrome scenario), that an attempted de-shittification of their OS is being hailed as (nostalgia tinted?) greatness :)

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#138
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My group makes a custom executable to reflash a hardware device we produce. We build it for Linux and Darwin. Trying to get the program to work with our Mac users has become harder and harder. These are all internal developers. Enabling developer mode and allowing Terminal execution isn't enough. Disabling the quarantine bit works - sometimes - but now we're getting automated nastygrams from corporate IT threatening…

I understand that you're doing it on principle, but for a software development team, 99$/year is a really minuscule price to pay to be able to build / notarise / distribute software. Developers pay exorbitant amount of money for much lesser value, and the idea of putting your teammates at risk to stick it to apple is kind of sad bordering with negligence from a business POV.

The tool is built deep in our CI/CD chain. The whole thing is a house of cards built on a massive pile of tinder next to an open drum of kerosene. You want me to integrate XCode into that?

Last time I tried setting up an Apple developer license inside a large corporation, one that they paid for and not tied to me or my credit card, it was also a nightmare.

And yes, it's also on principle.

Re: Apple needs a Snow Sequoia

#139
post #32

I'm done with macOS, I've migrated to Linux for my general purpose computing. With every new release of macOS, Gatekeeper is becoming harder and harder to bypass, increasing Apple's control over what software can be run on macOS, forcing apps to be signed with an Apple Developer ID. While I'm happy they are taking security seriously, I'm seriously creeped out that macOS sends hashes of every executable I run to their…

I understand and appreciate the sentiment, but I see the intent very differently. Apple is not employing a frog boiling strategy, but rather being responsive to an increasingly sophisticated adversary. It’s like criticism of the quality of Google search dropping. It has absolutely tanked, but it’s not because the algorithm is worse, it’s because the internet has grown orders of magnitude and most of it uses the same…

It is because the algorithm is worse. So many garbage results are showing up which they continue to allow.

Kagi lets me completely block specific domains. If Google cared about quality they’d let you do the same.

Post reply on HN