Live data from Hacker News

Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

oncontracts.com

131–140 of 210 posts

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#131
post #48

I remember buying audio gear (think receiver, amplifier, cd player) and being the focus of the upsell for 2-5x more expensive monster cables. Once I patiently explained that a cable shouldn't matter for digital as long as the bits got there, and seeing the young sales guy pause and then "get it". And I got the (relatively) cheap cables. Also speaker wire. You can get perfectly good copper cables for less, probably in…

> Once I patiently explained that a cable shouldn't matter for digital as long as the bits got there . Emphasis mine. As someone that sold AV equipment, including cables, in the late ‘00s / early ‘10s, nerds that misunderstood the nuances of this were the single worst group of customers to work with. You could see them coming a mile away. By the time “gold-plated HDMI cables are a scam” gets down to their level of ps…

Except 99 times out of 100 it was an attempt at an unnecessary, scammy upsell to a high margin cable, when the cheap one would and did do just as well.

People frequently did try to claim you would get deeper reds and better blacks and all sorts of audiophile-grade bullshit by spending that extra hundred dollars on magic cables.

While you feel you might have been knowledgeable and honest in intent, the retail electronics industry as a whole is filled with a heady mix of ignorance and profiteering, to the detriment of customers. They’re almost always better served by grabbing cables from an online vendor after leaving the store.

And that’s if the devices they buy don’t already come with a perfectly good HDMI cable, which most do now.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#132
post #22

Monster Cables is a name I hadn't thought about in ages... I mostly remember them as the company that tried to convince people that digital images would look better via a more expensive cable.

Just checked and the first item that garbage dump that is Amazon advertises is an HDMI cable that’s faster and provides a better picture than others.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#133

The complete story: https://www.bluejeanscable.com/legal/mcp/index.htm

In particular, I'd recommend looking at the full response. While the original article covers the plain-language juicy-sounding excerpts, the full letter to Monster also contains some artful legalese that even I as layman can appreciate: It starts with several pages worth of requests for information. I'm pretty sure those aren't actually requests for information - they're a threat. If Monster were to actually sue, he'…

[dead]

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#134
post #22

Monster Cables is a name I hadn't thought about in ages... I mostly remember them as the company that tried to convince people that digital images would look better via a more expensive cable.

Not as bad as this HDMI cable claiming it has "anti-virus protection to reduce virus noises".

https://www.zdnet.com/article/this-xbox-hdmi-cable-has-anti-...

https://www.gamesmen.com.au/cable-xb3-hdmi-lx-swivel

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#135
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> If you are willing to type this up for karma If I cared about HN karma, I'd just post "why not Rust?" on every Go post, and "why not Go?" on every Rust post. > why wouldn't you just tell the lawyer this or contact the current webmaster Because the lawyer was trying to scare me with nonsensical legal threats. I'm not interested in helping people who threaten me with legal action. > your retelling just seems really p…

I genuinely laughed out loud from “why not Rust?”. Thank you. That cult give Haskell snobs a run for their money.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#136
post #28
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For anybody who’s wondering what happened next, this is from the above link: “Monster's counsel had made a horrible mistake, and probably caused lasting harm to the company, by sending me that ridiculous letter. But he, and Monster, did apparently know the first rule of holes: "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." The end, therefore, of the story was a bit anticlimactic. Knowing that I was able to defend my…

> Monster's counsel had made a horrible mistake, and probably caused lasting harm to the company, by sending me that ridiculous letter This sort of thing always reminds of the Jack Daniels cease and desist letter[0], which, at least for me, had the exact opposite effect. 0. https://brokenpianoforpresident.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/jac...

That is like the most polite legal letter I’ve seen!

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#138
Or you could screw up so monumentally that the “case” (it was never actually brought) becomes an actual meme. I give you the case of Arkell vs Pressdram [1]. I have actually seen a response to a business threat which ended with “I refer you to the response in the case of Arkell vs Pressdram”…

1: https://proftomcrick.com/2014/04/29/arkell-v-pressdram-1971/

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I definitely got upsold on a Monster cable when I bought my first guitar on the back of that lifetime warranty. Joke's on me, I guess; the cable is almost 20 years old and still working, never had to use the warranty even once. I need to take worse care of my things.

Guitar cable?, ya...noooo cordless my droogys prolly cheaper too did a custom stealth mod to one guitar where the transmitter, plugs into 1/4 jack,under the back cover nice thing is that its possible to turn an amp up to face peeling loudness, and step back, and not get hurt, got to watch for things vibrating off of shelves though and are you kidding me?, I know that as a guitarer there are cumulative cognitive effec…

Some dressing to go with that salad, man?
Post reply on HN