[flagged]
The government puts money into his corporations, maybe you could elaborate on what extent said "success" is dependent on this relation?
Grok3 Launch [video]
131–140 of 1001 posts
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#132https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/elon-musks-terrifying-visi... I'm not sure if this was a very bad joke by Elon, or if Grok 3 is really biased like that.
> Everyone—and not just The Information—should be genuinely terrified that the richest man in the world has built a Large Language Model that spouts propaganda in his image.
If we survived Gemini refusing to draw white vikings we will survive that too.
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#133[flagged]
I think they just don’t like him for political views and they feed themselves with mainstream media
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#134[flagged]
Success doesn’t imply honesty, good faith or absence of bias. You already know this.
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it's already clear that these are going to be commoditized and the free / open source versions will be good enough to capture enough of the value that the remaining players will not be Facebook-level monopolies on the space
the IP rights holders have yet to bare their teeth. I don't think the outcome you suggest is clear at all, in fact I think if anything entirely the opposite is the most probable outcome. I've lost count of the number of technology epochs that at the time were either silently or explicitly dependent on ignoring the warez aspects while being blinded by the possibilities, Internet video, music and film all went through…
Good historical comparison, but I doubt it this time because there is plausible deniability that a model wasn't trained on a given piece of data.
Also, the pool of public domain data is always increasing, so the AI will eventually win in any case, even if we have to wait 100 years
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#136[flagged]
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#137[flagged]
I find it interesting that these two descriptions of news are treated as equivalent, where I think they're almost opposing: "raw, unfiltered news" "real, trustworthy news" Raw and unfiltered almost cannot be "news" (by my definition of what I go seeking for as "news"). X provides raw, unfiltered information. But real, trustworthy news almost requires filtration in order to be deemed trustworthy.
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
the IP rights holders have yet to bare their teeth. I don't think the outcome you suggest is clear at all, in fact I think if anything entirely the opposite is the most probable outcome. I've lost count of the number of technology epochs that at the time were either silently or explicitly dependent on ignoring the warez aspects while being blinded by the possibilities, Internet video, music and film all went through…
Good historical comparison, but I doubt it this time because there is plausible deniability that a model wasn't trained on a given piece of data. Also, the pool of public domain data is always increasing, so the AI will eventually win in any case, even if we have to wait 100 years
As I recall it, there was a time when copyright infringement on YouTube was so prolific that the rightsholders essentially forced creation of the first watermarking system that worked at massive scale. I do wonder if any corners of research are currently studying the attribution problem with the specific lens of licensing as its motivation
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#139[flagged]
Re: Grok3 Launch [video]
#140https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/elon-musks-terrifying-visi... I'm not sure if this was a very bad joke by Elon, or if Grok 3 is really biased like that.
[flagged]