First congrats on the launch - I like it.
My feedback: what’s there looks inviting. Email interaction is handy, other ways would be too.
If there was a low code way to arrange the humanlayer primitives for folks at the edge of using it, I think human tasks could meet something like this even broader. Happy to chat offline.
Onto your comment: The coding for coding agents is still kinda prototype. It feels like some folks quietly have setup a very productive workflow themselves for quite sometime.
Still, there no doubt you could ship production code in some cases - except ai needs to handle all the things development explicitly and implicitly checks before doing so.
Getting to build some things that became more than few orders of magnitude larger than planned, one can learn a lot from the deep experiences of others… and I’m not sure where that is in AI. Speaking to someone with experience and insight can provide some profound insight, clarification and simplification.
Still, an axiom for me remains: clever architecture still tends to beat clever coding.
The best code often is the code that’s not written and not maintained and hopefully the functionality can be achieved through interacting with the architecture.
This approach is only one way, but it can take both domain knowledge and data knowledge, to put in enough a domain and data driven design relative to how well the developer may know the required and anticipated needs.
The high end of software development is many leagues beyond even what I just described. There’s a lot of talk about 10x engineers, I’d say there can be developers who definitely can be 10x as effective or reach 10x more of the solution, than average.
If a lot of the code AI is modelled on is based on the body of code in repos, most on a wide scale may be average to above average at most, perfectly serviceable and iteratively updated.
Sometimes we see those super elegant designs of fewer tables and code that does near everything, because it’s developments 5th or 6th version creating major overhauls. It could be refactored, or if the schema is not brittle, maybe a rewrite in full or part of the exact same team is present to do it.
Today’s AI could help shed a light in some of those directions, relative to the human using it. This again says in the hands of an expert developer AI can do a ton more for them, but the line to automation might be something else.
There is agentic ai and human in the loop to still figure itself out, as well as how to improve the existing processes. 2025 looks to be interesting.