Live data from Hacker News

Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

oxfam.org

131–140 of 158 posts

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you run a business or consult, there's a ton of opportunity. The amount of grey area advice I received from my ex-CPA taught me that there is ample opportunity there. This is also why she's my ex-CPA.

What's a CPA?

Probably "Certified Public Accountant"

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#133
post #79

[flagged]

Please don't do this here.

Oh, I see.

I can cry foul towards Microsoft all day here, but not some faux charity which hosts fuck parties with underage and forced prostitutes.

Makes sense.

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#134
post #78
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine flood mitigation for population centers, hydroelectric dams, renewable energy, electricity grids, rail lines and public transportation, etc

Healthcare, education, housing, food ...

[dead]

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#135
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The World Bank is an international organization, accountable to its shareholder governments, themselves accountable to their respective people, as all but China, Russia and Saudi Arabia are democracies.

Yes, and those govts can demand accountability. Its citizens cannot see the spending of other govts just because they feel entitled. No country funded the entire operation.

Your govt likely received foreign aid spent on citizens. Does this entitle citizens of that foreign govt to peer into your personal finances because part of them were mixed with foreign money? No, it doesn’t. Just because your govt put money somewhere that was mixed with other actor money doesn’t entitle you to seeing all financials of that entity.

If your standard is something even partially touched by tax money needs its finances made fully public, then you’ll need to include citizens making their finances made fully public. This is stupid, right?

Instead, if you do what all first world countries do, have your govt disclose where it spent money, then that is your accountability. Demanding what you want here isn’t good policy; it’s targeted outrage without thinking of its results.

Think through the consequences of your outrage.

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#138
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Nonprofits do why no for profits too?

Nonprofits don’t. There goes your argument. They comply with tax laws, but you can’t see them.

Why do people just make crap up?

Re: Up to $41B in World Bank climate finance unaccounted for, Oxfam finds

#139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> I’d guess you’re American based on your entitlement. Probably. Only Americans demand accountability from governments and publicly funded international organizations. The rest of us have learned to shut up and keep our heads down, and continue to worship our masters.

The dozens of countries ranked less corrupt than the US beg to differ.

Maybe if Americans were aware of things like this they’d learn from them instead of pretending they somehow are good at something.

Post reply on HN