Live data from Hacker News

Google Cache is fully dead

seroundtable.com

131–140 of 249 posts

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#131

Is anyone at Google even aware how much this hurts their brand? I received an email from Google today with the subject line "Meet the new Google TV Streamer (4K)" The sender was Google Chromecast. Apparently it's some sort of streaming hardware they are selling for £99. I won't even consider buying one. How long until it's an obsolete brick? And when it's a brick, what are the chances I can wipe it and install my own…

[deleted]

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The real question is why they'd have to be aware. It's entirely possible that those of us who pay attention to this are a vanishing minority compared to the cultural momentum of Google as the default search provider and a dominant provider of email/office SaaS. But even if dissatisfaction is growing, the institional momentum is just so huge that it's very likely Google simply doesn't have the capacity to sense any br…

It matters because the HN crowd maybe small when it comes consumer products , but is a dominant factor for cloud purchases. Having been burnt too many times with Google products[1] I try not use their offerings on the cloud many decision makers are here who will worry about similar issues. If Google wants to be serious about Cloud then they need to be serious about long term support. Microsoft in the win 3 /9x days t…

Google cache had what, 15 years of support, with no promises ever?

I think of all the google.products, that's pretty good.

Inbox still hurts though, but not as much as google music

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you describe this more? Curious as I was looking at their offerings.

For starters there is this: https://killedbygoogle.com/

Was looking for something AI specific. Those are B2B services from their cloud.

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#135
post #68

Very sad to see it gone. It was always some kind of last resort. Internet Archive is lovely, don't get me wrong, but it relies mostly on people actively queueing up sites to save. So most of the time for more obscure sites where the bitrot was already in place and they aren't loading anymore you could use the Google cache to get something out of it – where IA had nothing.

I do worry about the future of IA. Simply because of some of their reckless moves with their book lending policy, they have opened themselves up to being bleed dry financially. That plus the amount of copyright infringement openly available on the site is just waiting to be attacked. I am waiting for Nintendo to get wind of the huge ROM dumps on there, it is not going to pretty. No manner of 'moral high ground' will…

I disagree. I am happy the Internet Archive are fighting the draconian copy right laws that exist.

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#138

I'm pretty sure that Google's main business is cancelling products. Things like search and ads are just side gigs.

I was thinking today that companies like google don't understand the implication of losing or discarding a couple percent of their customers per year every year.

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#139
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I do worry about the future of IA. Simply because of some of their reckless moves with their book lending policy, they have opened themselves up to being bleed dry financially. That plus the amount of copyright infringement openly available on the site is just waiting to be attacked. I am waiting for Nintendo to get wind of the huge ROM dumps on there, it is not going to pretty. No manner of 'moral high ground' will…

I disagree. I am happy the Internet Archive are fighting the draconian copy right laws that exist.

But the arena for that fight is legislation. Weed didn't become legal through lawsuits, it became legal because laws were repealed. I hope IA prevails but it's long shot, even more with the Heritage infestation of the courts.

Re: Google Cache is fully dead

#140
post #113
post #108

Can someone ELI5 what google cache was and why it was important? Was it essentially a wayback machine alternative? People are upset about its removal; curious to understand why.

You could access a snapshot of the page that was taken when google was indexing it. It is helpful if the site content changed or was removed shortly after google indexed it. This often lead to wrong search result preview texts which you could still find in the cache. The internet archive has a different focus and maybe you won't find the missing information that google has indexed there.

Right, that was the real value of the feature: you got to see what Google saw or thought it saw. Plenty of sites serve different things to Googlebot and the Google cache could often help untangle that mess.
Post reply on HN