Live data from Hacker News

Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

martin.wojtczyk.de

131–140 of 408 posts

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#131
post #14

One of my favourite unreported MacOS issues comes from how, at some point, they changed the appearance of the window close button to be a particular shade of red with a tiny little X in the center. And if you happen to be using a particular kind of screen and possibly wearing glasses, that little X kind of wanders around in the button, appearing just slightly off center in a maddening way. Made only more maddening by…

I mean horizontal and vertical centering is the hardest thing in computer science

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#132
post #42
post #14

One of my favourite unreported MacOS issues comes from how, at some point, they changed the appearance of the window close button to be a particular shade of red with a tiny little X in the center. And if you happen to be using a particular kind of screen and possibly wearing glasses, that little X kind of wanders around in the button, appearing just slightly off center in a maddening way. Made only more maddening by…

>More expensive lenses have a coating to compensate for this chromatic aberration. You can't compensate for chromatic aberration with a coating. You need a compound lens made from multiple elements each with a different dispersion, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achromatic_lens More expensive glasses lenses usually have worse chromatic aberration than cheap ones. The cheapest material for glasses lenses (PADC, o…

I can’t speak to glasses, but limiting chromatic aberration in the binocular world does seem to involve coatings (at least as Swarovski, Leica, Zeiss present it).

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#133

In that picture I'm personally more bothered by the antialiasing than by the misalignment.

I'm disturbed by the ambiguous UI.

Is 'Hide Binary" enabled or disabled? If it's enabled, why is it a different colour to the slider that has presumably selected Base-16?

Are the binary digits editable?

Are "ASCII" and "Unicode" mutually exclusive as you'd expect, in which case why are they both the same colour?

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#134
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I still see MacOS as the best choice for my desktop/laptop uses (browser and SSH), [...] Almost anything will do for those?

Recently windows has become much better for things a linux or macOS user takes for granted, like using ssh (a quick google search tells you how to install it using powershell), but is missing a lot of features. Two recent examples for me are taking 5 minutes to figure out how to install and use rsync, and taking 10 minutes finding a program to add/delete pages from a pdf file that's not a trial or demo of some kind.

That’s pretty quick?

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#135
post #7

Starting to see this with view counts on YouTube in Firefox after some recent UI updates.

I don't remember in which browser I saw this, Chrome or Firefox, but when a block of text suddenly becomes a bit more animated (eg. moves around in a div) you could see it change from Windows' native font rendering method to DirectWrite-style fuzzy edges.

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#136
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>More expensive lenses have a coating to compensate for this chromatic aberration. You can't compensate for chromatic aberration with a coating. You need a compound lens made from multiple elements each with a different dispersion, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achromatic_lens More expensive glasses lenses usually have worse chromatic aberration than cheap ones. The cheapest material for glasses lenses (PADC, o…

I can’t speak to glasses, but limiting chromatic aberration in the binocular world does seem to involve coatings (at least as Swarovski, Leica, Zeiss present it).

If you cut some wavelengths, you won't get their contribution to the distortions ;)

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#137
post #38

Reminds me of Microsoft calculator having a one pixel off between buttons: https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/a5r971/t...

That's awfull!! I couldn't use it anymore after I've seen it once

Use the old one, it’s better anyway: https://winaero.com/get-calculator-from-windows-8-and-window...

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#138
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>More expensive lenses have a coating to compensate for this chromatic aberration. You can't compensate for chromatic aberration with a coating. You need a compound lens made from multiple elements each with a different dispersion, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achromatic_lens More expensive glasses lenses usually have worse chromatic aberration than cheap ones. The cheapest material for glasses lenses (PADC, o…

I can’t speak to glasses, but limiting chromatic aberration in the binocular world does seem to involve coatings (at least as Swarovski, Leica, Zeiss present it).

You can’t eliminate chromatic aberration with coatings, it’s a physical property of how the lens interacts with light. The only way to fix it is to adjust your lens types or materials. Zeiss’ current marketing seems to agree https://www.zeiss.com/consumer-products/us/nature-observatio...

Coatings are still very useful to reduce other lens artefacts though.

Re: Is my vision that bad? No, it's just a bug in Apple's Calculator

#140

Comically, I didn't even notice those wobbly numbers in the first screenshot, I was too busy noticing: - "Unicode" button label way off center - The 8/10/16 selector being off center in its own position - The indicators for bits 31 and 63 are not aligned with each other - x and + not being horizontally aligned (I believe this is an icon-font issue, seen on HN before so knew to look for it)

Arguably it also should be “1s’” instead of “1’s”. ;)
Post reply on HN