Live data from Hacker News

The only tourist in Moldova

telegraph.co.uk

131–140 of 427 posts

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Russia hasnt taken a single large city since the start of the war. They are struggling to even keep the front intact (which is why Putin now begs for peace). They wont suddenly blast through all of Ukraine and invade a new country just over a night. But sure never hurts to be prepared.

And if it is NATO blasting through Moldova into Ukraine?

why would they; more realistic would be Romania and Ukraine deciding to disarm Transnistria on behalf of Moldova

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#132
post #116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> He's only been in America a few years so as soon as he speaks the entire bar knows he's Russian. Because Americans are so good at distinguishing Slavic languages by ear in a noisy room? I live near a Russian Orthodox church. People complain about the congregants, but mostly about their parking. A house opposite the church as a Ukrainian flag prominently hung; on the other hand one of the congregants has a sticker o…

> Because Americans are so good at distinguishing Slavic languages by ear in a noisy room? There is a simpler explanation: Russian is probably the only Slavic language most Americans know about.

Unfortunately it's just due to the number of people. It's unlikely a random person could tell a difference between Polish and Russian, much less Ukrainian and Russian.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You aren’t saying very much. What is a rape apologist in this context?

He takes advantage of lower socioeconomic status women in poor countries with uneven gender dynamics and makes a jokey travel vlog in between. He has also given the classic "it's basically their fault" argument.

Which countries?

Arguably, women of post-socialist (Slavic) countries have comparatively higher socioeconomic status and comparatively more even gender dynamics that these in the West.

For a dedicated sexual predator, it would be much easier to just head directly to Thailand or similar.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#134
post #60

I wonder what will happen to them if Ukraine loses to Russia. I have heard Moldova already has issues with Russian separatists. EDIT: Changed an offensive use of a definitive article. ;)

You're thinking of Transnistria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transnistria The history of that area is complex. Moldova itself was part of the Ottoman Empire, then it was ceded to the Russian Empire, united with Romania, then the whole are became part of the USSR... and after the dissolution of the USSR, Transnistria became an unregognized, but de facto autonomous "country". Moldovians see the area as still part of…

> Eastern Ukraine is headed for the same destiny, it seems

it doesn't, Russia hasn't officially annexed Transnistria as it did with occupied Ukrainian territories

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#135

Travelling to any ex-USSR countries on the periphery from the "western" world is taking a nice fun gamble. The bigger places in Kazakhstan are probably okay, and yeah, you likely would have fun in Tbilisi or Yerevan, but the chance of you having a very bad time in Bishkek or (heavens forbid) the Dushanbe is just too high. It could be a lot of fun, it would be fairly cheap by western standards, it will certainly be un…

As someone living "on the edge" (in one of the post-soviet countries which are now belonging to the "western world") I... don't understand your sentiment. I live in the EU, frequently travel to the western Europe and across the ocean for work meetings and conferences, and I worked for two years in France, so I'm pretty familiar with the west. On the other hand, for recreation I often travel south (think balcans) and east (excluding two obvious unfriendly countries). And these countries, their norms, laws, everyday problems, are basically the same as in the western Europe. I don't mean in abstract "we are all people", I mean really the post-USSR counties are very similar, just slightly poorer, less mature (getting used to democracy is not easy and not everyone succeeds immediately), and with the post-soviet "oriental" vibe that western people like to exaggregate.

In short, I think this is a simplistic point of view, and one that is unfair to the people living in the countries you deem dangerous to "western" people.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#136

Travelling to any ex-USSR countries on the periphery from the "western" world is taking a nice fun gamble. The bigger places in Kazakhstan are probably okay, and yeah, you likely would have fun in Tbilisi or Yerevan, but the chance of you having a very bad time in Bishkek or (heavens forbid) the Dushanbe is just too high. It could be a lot of fun, it would be fairly cheap by western standards, it will certainly be un…

This kinda looks like baseless fearmongering for me.

In Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan you'll be pretty much safe everywhere throughout the country. In Kyrgyzstan, I'd avoid rural non-tourist areas, but to Bishkek and tourist destinations I'd go without second thoughts. Tajikistan is questionable, but not Dushanbe.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#137
The table on that page (countries with the most and least tourists per capita) is a prime example of how NOT to present data. There are so many better ways of visualizing tourism than lazily dumping a spreadsheet with one significant figure after the decimal on a page.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#138

Another place I'd like to go is Kyrgyzstan. And Turkmenistan. Why? Because no one goes there. What other reason do you need?

I’ve been to Bishkek, it’s a really interesting place. At the time everything was still straight out of the Soviet Union (maybe still is) and the people were all friendly. The mountains are immense and beautiful.

The tourist experience wasn’t sugarcoated at all though. It’s a genuine poor country with not a whole lot happening. Id say go for it, it’s a place that I find myself thinking of often.

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#139

Visit Transnistria for another level of amazement if you're in the area. The last Soviet republic.

There's a BBC short series from some years ago where our intrepid correspondent visits twilight zones. The episode on Transdnestr is really a trip. He even manages to visit an arms factory masquerading as making consumer stuff. The episode is worth looking up.

You haven't really given us enough information to find it - have you got a name or star or anything?

Re: The only tourist in Moldova

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Because Americans are so good at distinguishing Slavic languages by ear in a noisy room? There is a simpler explanation: Russian is probably the only Slavic language most Americans know about.

Unfortunately it's just due to the number of people. It's unlikely a random person could tell a difference between Polish and Russian, much less Ukrainian and Russian.

I doubt many Russians can tell the difference between Ukrainian and Polish either. I unironically think that some of them convinced themselves they were fighting Polish mercenaries just because they heard western Ukrainian accents.
Post reply on HN