Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm arguing it's a game and one I don't play anymore. Consumers aren't infinitely rational homo-economicus logicians and discussing products as if they are is irrelevant. People might buy into the UV and IR just because they could. It doesn't have to be practical and they don't have to ever use it. The modern iPhone: No removable battery, too big for pockets, cash cow of a multi trillion dollar company, lacks a headp…
> They're all frustrating plastic things sitting in the corner. > There's plenty of innovation left. > Lists a bunch of features that either already exist or have no practical application You're telling me there's lots of meat on the bone for innovation but then I'm not actually seeing anything that hasn't already existed that would make them not the same frustrating plastic things in the corner they are today. Maybe…
There's countless successful things you've probably looked at and scratched your head thinking "that's been around a long time".
I don't know if I can explain this distinction anymore. Think about something you don't really care about. Let's take socks. There's these technical features, weave pattern, stitch strength, balance of the polymers of the materials, etc I've never thought about. Instead, I find some I think I'll like and I wear them. There's zero intellectualization that goes into the process. I was probably swayed by more colorful packaging.
You gotta meet people at that level for mass appeal because most people don't care about what you care about. They're not stupid, they just don't share your passions.
Anyways I've got other things to do.