Earlier quoted context omitted.
Android is just fine. Unless you're an artist who actually wants the super fancy pen interactions and display, there's really not that much difference. You may be more used to one over the other, but I guarantee it works the other way too.
I know many non-artists who want high refresh rate displays and low latency stylus input. It’s not “super fancy”. Let’s not move the goalposts; the iPad hardware is years beyond any other tablet. Android is not “just fine”. The hardware available is relatively low quality compared to the iPad.
macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
131–140 of 143 posts
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
[citation needed] A large portion of western media is state-funded public broadcasters (the BBC, CBC, PBS, ...), and another large swathe is under the control of various explicitly right-leaning corporations (Murdoch's News Corp and Fox, Sinclair, ...). While there are indeed numerous liberal-leaning media outlets, it is entirely unclear to me that they have equivalent reach to their conservative counterparts.
NPR is state-funded and is far-far left. If you consider PBS and BBC to somehow be conservative I guess that's why things are entirely unclear to you. What on earth would you like me to cite? plurality /ploo͝-răl′ĭ-tē/ noun A large number or amount; a multitude. > there are indeed numerous liberal-leaning media outlets Ahem..
If you consider NPR to be far-far left then what is Jezebel, The Young Turks, Jacobin, or Democracy Now? That's not even getting into things like Socialist Alternative or pod casts like Chapo Trap House.
Between the ones I listed and NPR are sites like Slate and Vox which are to the left of NPR but not as far left as Democracy Now.
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
> No, I mean, "not allowing you to run arbitrary code" is just a side-effect, not the design choice. The design choice is market segmentation. It absolutely is a design choice. Apple wants to control all the code that runs on users' devices. Market segmentation is merely a side-effect.
> Apple wants to control all the code that runs on users' devices. Market segmentation is merely a side-effect. You have cause and effect reversed
Apple would have liked to lock down macOS, but it's just not feasible (for now).
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Apple wants to control all the code that runs on users' devices. Market segmentation is merely a side-effect. You have cause and effect reversed
No, I don't. iPhones don't segment anything, yet they are locked tight. Apple would have liked to lock down macOS, but it's just not feasible (for now).
Of course they do. There's market segmentation between iPhone tiers, between just using the iPhone as a computer (connecting it to a monitor and running macOS on it), differentiating iOS from the much less tightly maintained Android ecosystem (for which "walled garden" is a feature felt as "less hassle, less malware, more secure, mostly just works"), and several other things.
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
> create market segmentation Which is the "better edition": $2000 iPad Pro or $2000 Macbook? If the goal is to maximize hardware device proliferation, third (and Nth) variants could be created with software-locked differentiation. Why stop at 2 hardware editions?
> Which is the "better edition": $2000 iPad Pro or $2000 Macbook? The one of the two with a lower profit margin for the manufacturer would usually be the one considered to have more "value" in it. The usual way to measure this, when software editions are locked to particular hardware, is by looking at the cheapest hardware they sell that'll have the given edition of the software installed. (Another example of this: m…
If Apple made an iPad Ultra with Linux terminal/framebuffer long-running background VMs, alongside interactive iPadOS apps, it would sell like hotcakes.
We'll have to wait for Nuvia devices to show the benefits of this use case, before Apple claims credit for a new iPad Pro customer segment.
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
If they are replacement or not should be decision of person who bought it, not company who sells it. They can still keep their ecosystem. You should be able to unlock it to install alternative operating system. Unlocking should be explicit to not give an option for theft.
Nope! In the same way, I don't want to be able to install a "custom" OS in my car; I don't want the ability in more personal devices. "Opening" is weakening; there's no way around it.
Your ask violates mine.
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
[citation needed] A large portion of western media is state-funded public broadcasters (the BBC, CBC, PBS, ...), and another large swathe is under the control of various explicitly right-leaning corporations (Murdoch's News Corp and Fox, Sinclair, ...). While there are indeed numerous liberal-leaning media outlets, it is entirely unclear to me that they have equivalent reach to their conservative counterparts.
NPR is state-funded and is far-far left. If you consider PBS and BBC to somehow be conservative I guess that's why things are entirely unclear to you. What on earth would you like me to cite? plurality /ploo͝-răl′ĭ-tē/ noun A large number or amount; a multitude. > there are indeed numerous liberal-leaning media outlets Ahem..
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
What eWaste are you talking about? The lifetime, battery life, and software updates are way longer than those of any other tablet on the market. iPads are not a replacement for Macbooks or PCs; let it be the iPad.
There has not yet been a tablet that was commercially competitive with iPad, measured by sales volume/revenue. Perhaps a future PC OEM 2-in-1 will be successful, based on Qualcomm Oryon/Arm SoC from ex-Apple Nuvia. > software updates are way longer There's no "longer" for comparison, when there is no competitor. Old iPads could continue to work for years, running Linux. Apple could unlock the boot after terminating s…
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope! In the same way, I don't want to be able to install a "custom" OS in my car; I don't want the ability in more personal devices. "Opening" is weakening; there's no way around it.
My ask doesn't violate your freedom. Your ask violates mine.
Re: macOS 15.0 supports Nested Virtualization on M3 chips
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a 12 year old iPad running as a photo frame. Doesn’t get security updates, but then again it stays at home with only a single app running. One of the things that keeps fascinating me about Apple is how they keep coming out with better and better iPads, even though they don’t seem to have any real competition. Take the new iPad Pro. It’s super thin, got a brand new tandem OLED screen that goes up to 1000 nits a…
Do you run any specific app for photo frame or just included Photos app? I have an old iPad, haven’t been using it so this gave me an idea.
It's fairly stable. Only really run into issues when the internet goes out and then comes back later, sometimes this would make the app stop showing photos.
https://apps.apple.com/no/app/soloslides-for-google-photos/i...