131–137 of 137 posts
It produces decent audio, but something unpleasant about its high frequencies. And no voices, it doesn't seem to talk or sing. Udio, so far, is undefeated. And ElevenLabs' music demos were very very impressive, but it's still not released.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But you're a tech person. I'm trying to think of this from the point of view of e.g. a likely potential jury. Again: Imagine two AI machines, different in one way: One of them has been fed "Article X" and the other hasn't. You press buttons on the machine(s) in the same way. The machine that was fed "Article X" spits out something that looks like Article X, and the one that wasn't, doesn't. The magic inside, I don't…
>But you're a tech person. I'm trying to think of this from the point of view of e.g. a likely potential jury. Courts can call experts to testify on matters requiring specialized knowledge or expertise.
- You put thing into the machine
- You press buttons, it makes obvious derivative work
- You don't put thing into the machine, and it can't do that anymore.
There is "something" in there GENERATING COPIES and we see exactly where it came from, even if we can't identify it in the code or whatever.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A program that can produce copies is the same as a copy. How that copy comes into being (whether out of an algorithm or read from a support) is related, but not relevant.
A human illustrator can also copy existing works. As a result they are not criminalized for making other non-copies. The output of an AI needs to be considered independently of its input. Further, the folly of copyright ought to be also considered, since no work -- whether solely human in origin (such as speech, unaccompanied song, dance etc.) or built with technological prosthesis/instrumentality -- is ever made in…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of these are impressive in the least. Anything I have heard from Udio is basically trash. It is the AI art equivalent of synthetic cats and pretty face shots. Who cares. What is ultimately going to be undefeated is training your own model.
I've heard many good things from Udio and the demo tracks from ElevenLabs are very high quality. https://www.udio.com/songs/ai2uAaBffRGdWdTNNqAbDx https://www.udio.com/songs/19xQAMG6E1UXG7wNvP7nDW https://www.udio.com/songs/mPAFYyFgo7Nqjb8ypeFfh9 https://www.udio.com/songs/7sKM9jMwZrXwTTzmMYN9qv https://www.udio.com/songs/coixNX1gnJ1oWT8z2LQddk
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've heard many good things from Udio and the demo tracks from ElevenLabs are very high quality. https://www.udio.com/songs/ai2uAaBffRGdWdTNNqAbDx https://www.udio.com/songs/19xQAMG6E1UXG7wNvP7nDW https://www.udio.com/songs/mPAFYyFgo7Nqjb8ypeFfh9 https://www.udio.com/songs/7sKM9jMwZrXwTTzmMYN9qv https://www.udio.com/songs/coixNX1gnJ1oWT8z2LQddk
I just don't see how any of these examples from Udio or ElevenLabs could be considered good. To me they sound just bland enough that I may be fooled by them if I weren't paying close attention. If I do pay attention it sounds like a song accidentally came about. It sounds like music might in a dream. Eerie.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just don't see how any of these examples from Udio or ElevenLabs could be considered good. To me they sound just bland enough that I may be fooled by them if I weren't paying close attention. If I do pay attention it sounds like a song accidentally came about. It sounds like music might in a dream. Eerie.
I think if I gave you 20 pieces of music, half of them made by AI, you wouldn't be able to tell which ones are made by AI much better than guessing randomly.