There is perhaps some irony in the fact that this blog was posted to Medium, which serves 10.88 MB for a 265-word article.
Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
131–140 of 515 posts
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#132Right?
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#133Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#134I want to make native apps but Apple and Microsoft seem to be trying really hard to stop me. I have to buy developer accounts, buy certificates for signing binaries, share 30% of my revenue with them for barely any reason and so on. Not to mention the mess they've introduced in their APIs - especially Microsoft. So of course we choose the much simpler, much cheaper way of the web.
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#135Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#136Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not think it is possible to have a commercial application, you have to pay Qt’s license.
Nah. But do it. You just have to open your source, that part which depends on Qt. It's not a real problem. But get a commercial license anyway, the cost is small compared to the other costs of developing your program, and you want to be friends with them. (There's someone on HN who lives on a single-line modification of an open source program. Trust me, source availability of the source code of your client app won't…
Now I want to know more about this :-)
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#138I want to make native apps but Apple and Microsoft seem to be trying really hard to stop me. I have to buy developer accounts, buy certificates for signing binaries, share 30% of my revenue with them for barely any reason and so on. Not to mention the mess they've introduced in their APIs - especially Microsoft. So of course we choose the much simpler, much cheaper way of the web.
[flagged]
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#139Yes because we promote blog posts on “idiomatic ruby” and “premature optimization is the root of all evil”. “Performance is less important than dev time”. We used to have developers who took less time and wrote better code.
Re: Did we lose our way in making efficient software?
#140Moore's law kept going, and software started getting a little bit faster, which was enough to stop undoing the gains made by hardware, and now things are back to mostly snappy.
Occasionally you'll get a 30mb file that's slow... but subjectively things sure seem better than 10 years ago when you couldn't even think about optimization without someone beating you over the head with a "premature optimization is the root of all evil" quote.