Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
131–140 of 836 posts
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#132Woof. I was considering kicking the tires on Netlify, but they are officially out of consideration now.
Doesn't make me feel great about Vercel either (which I was looking at)
You need to manually upgrade.
Unless you need more than the Free-Tier Vercel should be fine.
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s not because hosting instances doesn’t actually cost Amazon anything Except it doesn't cost them anything. The marginal cost of keeping your single instance running is $0 (unless they were 100% out of capacity and they could have sold that instance to someone else either at full price or spot price)
Electricity costs money
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#134There's a reason price plans are 'pay as you go' - so that they don't take on any risk for things like this. Moral of the story: never go for pay as you go by usage plans if this scenario is not mitigated through a third party. By no means am I trying to suggest a get out for Netlify here - more a rule of thumb for anyone worried the same could happen to them.
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#135Since the author has gone viral I expect some netlify exec is going to take over and write this bill off to $0. In the words of Kramer “these big companies, they just write it off!” A moment of silence for the people who got DDoS-ed, didn’t go viral and still had to pay $5k.
You don't even know what a write-off is.
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#136This is my worst nightmare as a bootstrapped founder. And that there's no way to put a limit on spend is ridiculous. Someone that doesn't want me to do well can simply ddos me into bankruptcy out of nowhere. Just went through Vercel's docs: --- "Vercel helps to mitigate against L3 and L4 DDoS attacks at the platform level. Usage will be incurred for requests that are successfully served prior to us automatically miti…
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#137Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#138Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#139> And since my amount is too large, they offer to discount to 5%, which means I still need to pay 5 thousand dollars. If they just reduce to 5% like that, it shows how disconnected this is from their real bandwidth cost. Really does feel like a scam.
It's a value added service, they don't trade bandwidth as a commodity. Therefore unfair characterisation.
Plus, if you dive deeper: Bandwidth doesn't cost anything because bandwidth is just about pulsing some light in some glass fiber and applying some minuscule voltage on some metal fiber.Okay, maybe it costs some amount of electricity but all this is just a business model for paying on capital expenditure through time share arrangements. People can have all kind of models for this, for example you can come together with others or pay it all by yourself to install the equipment and have free bandwidth for the lifetime of the equipment.
It's all just arrangements to cover the capital investment and earn something on top of it. That's not a scam. A scam would be if they didn't account correctly for the timeshare usage or induce usage to boost payments.
Re: Netlify just sent me a $104k bill for a simple static site
#140This is my worst nightmare as a bootstrapped founder. And that there's no way to put a limit on spend is ridiculous. Someone that doesn't want me to do well can simply ddos me into bankruptcy out of nowhere. Just went through Vercel's docs: --- "Vercel helps to mitigate against L3 and L4 DDoS attacks at the platform level. Usage will be incurred for requests that are successfully served prior to us automatically miti…
Now, who in the would would be thinking of having ddos protection for their hobby project? This is just absurd thinking.