Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it is "do whatever you were already doing with ML, faster" This question seems either from a place of deep confusion or is in bad faith. This post is about hardware. The hardware is model independent.* Any issues with models, like hallucinations, are going to be identical if it is run on this platform or a bunch of Nvidia GPUs. Performance in terms of hardware speed and efficiency are orthogonal to performance in…
Well ok, Groq provides lower latency cheaper access to the same models of questionable quality. Is this not putting lipstick on a pig scenario? I suppose more of a question to pig buyers.
Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
131–140 of 482 posts
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, it is "do whatever you were already doing with ML, faster" This question seems either from a place of deep confusion or is in bad faith. This post is about hardware. The hardware is model independent.* Any issues with models, like hallucinations, are going to be identical if it is run on this platform or a bunch of Nvidia GPUs. Performance in terms of hardware speed and efficiency are orthogonal to performance in…
Well ok, Groq provides lower latency cheaper access to the same models of questionable quality. Is this not putting lipstick on a pig scenario? I suppose more of a question to pig buyers.
Then someone comments that TikTok is a garbage fire and a horrible corrupting influence, yadda yadda, all that stuff. They ask: what is the point of making phones last longer just to watch TikTok? They say this improved efficiency in battery tech is just putting lipstick on a pig.
That's you in this thread. That's the kind of irrelevant non-contribution you are making here.
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#133Very impressive! I am even more impressed by the API pricing though - 0.27/1M tokens seems like an order of magnitude cheaper than the GPT-3.5 API, and two orders of magnitude cheaper than GPT-4? Am I missing something here?
They’re competing with the lowest cost competitors for mistral atm, which afaik is currently deepinfra at the same pricing
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#134Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, IIRC they reason on the car actions using LLMs. They still use image processing but once you identify the objects in the scene, the LLM interprets and decides what to do with the car. I'm not sure which one was it though(Ghost Autonomy maybe?).
Do you have a source? Because that actually, properly working would be headline global news and would value the company in the billions.
I found a few things when searched around but not sure which one was the one I recall.
Anyway, here is a video from one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2rbym6bXM0
Here is a paper discussing something similar: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07162
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#136Very impressive looking! Just wanted to caution it's worth being a bit skeptical without benchmarks as there are a number of ways to cut corners. One prominent example is heavy model quantization, which speeds up the model at a cost of model quality. Otherwise I'd love to see LLM tok/s progress exactly like CPU instructions/s did a few decades ago.
In other words, are we ready to steadily march on, improving LLM tok/s year by year, or are we a major breakthrough or two away before that can even happen?
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#137I used following prompt:
Generate gitlab ci yaml file for a hybrid front-end/backend project. Fronted is under /frontend and is a node project, packaged with yarn, built with vite to the /backend/public folder. The backend is a python flask server
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#138In how far is the API compatible with OpenAI? Does it offer logprobs[0] and top_logprobs[1]? 0. https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#c... 1. https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#c...
You can find our API docs here, including details of our OpenAI compatibility https://docs.api.groq.com/
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#139I just want to say that this is one of the most impressive tech demos I’ve ever seen in my life, and I love that it’s truly an open demo that anyone can try without even signing up for an account or anything like that. It’s surreal to see the thing spitting out tokens at such a crazy rate when you’re used to watching them generate at one less than one fifth that speed. I’m surprised you guys haven’t been swallowed up…
Re: Groq runs Mixtral 8x7B-32k with 500 T/s
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have a source? Because that actually, properly working would be headline global news and would value the company in the billions.
It was discussed here on HN, that's how I know about it. I found a few things when searched around but not sure which one was the one I recall. Anyway, here is a video from one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2rbym6bXM0 Here is a paper discussing something similar: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07162
> Ghost Autonomy’s MLLM-based capabilities are currently in development. These video and image examples show MLLM-based analysis of driving scenes captured from Ghost vehicles driving in both autonomous and conventional mode. MLLM-based reasoning is not yet being returned to the car to impact actual driving maneuvers.
So the model discussed is not doing any driving whatsoever. This is not self-driving at any level.