Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

131–140 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

Now you know how your girlfriend feels when she hears you speak with other software people :) Excuse my assumptions if they are incorrect. I'm making projections from my own point of view.

Reminds me of something I watched recently - "Struggling to understand Gen Z Slang" [0].

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGx4VtwMnfM

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#132

Ok, so there are now 2 tiers where they don't use our data to train the model? The higher bandwidth is to clearly entice new customers, but the question remains, what happens to the old ChatGPT Plus users? Do their quotas get eaten up by these new teams?

> what happens to the old ChatGPT Plus users? Do their quotas get eaten up by these new teams?

This is probably run on Microsoft servers (Azure, basically), not OpenAI servers, so it shouldn't directly compete for capacity. This is more of a "the pie got bigger" situation.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#133
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://imgur.com/WDrqxsz

What kind of emacs distribution is on the screenshot?

It's a new theme and/or distribution that I'm working on under the working title `hyper-modern`. It clearly takes inspiration from things like Doom (and I'm using their modeline which is hard to improve on) but it's mostly ground up and AI-first.

It's heavily integrated with my custom model server and stuff and I'm slowly getting it integrated with other leading tools (vscode and nvim and stuff).

I plan to MIT it all once it's at a reasonable RC. If I get there it will be available at `https://hyper-modern.ai` and `https://github.com/hyper-modern-ai`.

Thanks for asking!

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#134
The Engineering example is absolutely hilarious. Sure, I’m going to copy paste my code into an AI assistant to ask it about a bug that a linter would spot in realtime as I wrote the code.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#136
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah that was completely incoherent to me as well.

Same bro

My apologies to both you and grandparent, I faux-pass'd on using such sloppy jargon in a thread of general interest. If I can be useful in decoding some of that and helping to keep this topic accessible to the broader community I'd be happy to answer any questions about what I meant. I've cited a few useful resources elsewhere in the thread and am always eager to talk shop on topics like this, so fire away if you have any questions about the field or what the hell I was talking about :)

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#137

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

>Alibi

Do you have a source on Mistral/Mixtral using that?

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#138
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For some time I thought the primary way to opt out was to disable chat history. That made it impossible to use custom instructions. But I later found the account-level opt-out request, which, assuming they respect the weakly-worded “ask us not to train on your data” language, preserves the product’s full set of features: https://privacy.openai.com/policies

There is literally nothing on that page (nor in the linked help article that describes how to export data) that says how to tell them to "not use my data for training" and not loose history at the least. If you know more about this feature please do tell.

> 'There is literally nothing on that page that says how to tell them to "not use my data for training"...'

You can opt out of ChatGPT using your conversations for future training, without disabling any features like convo history.

Either some browser plug-in like an adblock is hiding the button from you, or you're not noticing and clicking it (I'm guessing the former [1]).

For me, on iPhone, there's a black button with white text "Make a Privacy Request" which sort of hovers bottom centre of the page the way "Chat Live with Support!" buttons often hover.

Click on that button to get to this - https://privacy.openai.com/policies?modal=take-control - which allows you to either delete your account, or:

"I would like to: Step 1 of 2 Do not train on my content Ask us to stop training on your content"

They then tell you it applies to content going forward, not stuff already done. But that's the opt out that doesn't require losing ChatGPT conversation history.

[1] On iOS Safari with 1Blocker enabled, I could see the button without it being hidden as an annoyance or widget or whatever, however when I tried entering email for opting out to check it still works it gave me an error message that suggested adblock type things might be the issue. I opened the page in Firefox for iOS (so same browser engine as Safari, but without 1Block) and it worked with no error message.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#139

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Curious that you mentioned "4.5-preview". What do you mean there? To my knowledge, and I searched to confirm, GPT-4.5 is not yet released. There were some rumors and a link to ChatGPT's answer about GPT-4.5 (could also be a hallucination) but Sam tweeted it was not true.

They literally made it up.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#140

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

We're all too mid. Luckily, these days we hoomans have AIs to help us understand other hoomans. Here is Gpt-4-1106-preview and Perplexity.ai versions trying to shed some light what was being said. https://pastebin.com/JuxfdrLg

Hilariously neither knows who is sama (Sam Altman, the Drama King of OpenAI), nor do they recognize when they themselves are being discussed.

Reading the responses in full also gives you a glimpse on specific merits or weaknesses of these systems, namely how up to date is their knowledge and lingo, explaining capabilities, and ability to see through multiple layers of referencing. Also showcases whether the AIs are willing to venture guessing to piece together some possible interpretation for hoomans to think about.

Post reply on HN