About 20 years ago I was an openbsd and freebsd admin, webhosting mostly. Then the rest of my maybe 16 year career was debian with some sprinkles of centos/rhel What would bring me to bsd today? Not in a negative way at all, I'm curious what people love about it. I barely remember much about it. I loved pf over iptables but I don't remember why. It has jailed containers which.. I think people still love? I'm not sure…
The fact BSD can't run Docker with its vast ecosystem is already a show stopper. Also having little glitches by tiny differences in shell handling make your already tuned Linux dotfiles incompatible that adds to the annoyances. And then I don't really get anything over Linux. pf is good but I'm just mostly using ufw and not running a router in the cloud that requires more than port handling. Ubuntu supports zfs in a…
HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
131–140 of 150 posts
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#132About 20 years ago I was an openbsd and freebsd admin, webhosting mostly. Then the rest of my maybe 16 year career was debian with some sprinkles of centos/rhel What would bring me to bsd today? Not in a negative way at all, I'm curious what people love about it. I barely remember much about it. I loved pf over iptables but I don't remember why. It has jailed containers which.. I think people still love? I'm not sure…
The fact BSD can't run Docker with its vast ecosystem is already a show stopper. Also having little glitches by tiny differences in shell handling make your already tuned Linux dotfiles incompatible that adds to the annoyances. And then I don't really get anything over Linux. pf is good but I'm just mostly using ufw and not running a router in the cloud that requires more than port handling. Ubuntu supports zfs in a…
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact BSD can't run Docker with its vast ecosystem is already a show stopper. Also having little glitches by tiny differences in shell handling make your already tuned Linux dotfiles incompatible that adds to the annoyances. And then I don't really get anything over Linux. pf is good but I'm just mostly using ufw and not running a router in the cloud that requires more than port handling. Ubuntu supports zfs in a…
a couple projects underway for containers, still wip but promising. https://hackmd.io/7BIT_khIRQyPAe4EdiigHg https://github.com/samuelkarp/runj
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact BSD can't run Docker with its vast ecosystem is already a show stopper. Also having little glitches by tiny differences in shell handling make your already tuned Linux dotfiles incompatible that adds to the annoyances. And then I don't really get anything over Linux. pf is good but I'm just mostly using ufw and not running a router in the cloud that requires more than port handling. Ubuntu supports zfs in a…
a couple projects underway for containers, still wip but promising. https://hackmd.io/7BIT_khIRQyPAe4EdiigHg https://github.com/samuelkarp/runj
Though I don't find anything better than Linux, it's not lacking either.
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#135About 20 years ago I was an openbsd and freebsd admin, webhosting mostly. Then the rest of my maybe 16 year career was debian with some sprinkles of centos/rhel What would bring me to bsd today? Not in a negative way at all, I'm curious what people love about it. I barely remember much about it. I loved pf over iptables but I don't remember why. It has jailed containers which.. I think people still love? I'm not sure…
A lot have happened for these 15-20 years: - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36972903 ... and that can give You another reason 'why': - https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2020/09/07/quare-freebsd/ ... but if you are happy where You are - then stay where You are. I moved to FreeBSD because I was not happy on Linux. Regards, vermaden
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#136About 20 years ago I was an openbsd and freebsd admin, webhosting mostly. Then the rest of my maybe 16 year career was debian with some sprinkles of centos/rhel What would bring me to bsd today? Not in a negative way at all, I'm curious what people love about it. I barely remember much about it. I loved pf over iptables but I don't remember why. It has jailed containers which.. I think people still love? I'm not sure…
For me the main point of bsd or small linuxes over debians/redhats is that running htop fills just one third of the screen and I can understand what each program does right away. It fills me with a sense of control and tranquility that just isn't there in more complex setups.
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then take a look at GnuStep or WindowMaker.
Window Maker does not use GNUstep or Objective-C at all, it is all written in plain C. In fact the UI toolkit it uses (developed for Window Maker itself) is called "WINGs" for "WINGs Is Not GNUstep".
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
For me the main point of bsd or small linuxes over debians/redhats is that running htop fills just one third of the screen and I can understand what each program does right away. It fills me with a sense of control and tranquility that just isn't there in more complex setups.
That's a great point. Would you consider yourself a minimalist in general? I think I'm the opposite. I'm one of those people who installs every (secure and vetted) plugin/extension/app that makes my life/work "easier." I have a ridiculous amount of vscode/intellij/obsidian plugins that I use. I'm sure if I used emacs/vim it'd be the same. Just as an example that's super frowned upon, I install about 5-10 various pack…
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#139Another project in this ecosystem: https://ravynos.com/
RavynOS is a much more interesting project. Basically it keeps everything that's open-source in Darwin (save for XNU), and re-implements what that's proprietary with tailor made free software, on top of a FreeBSD kernel. Since many layers, frameworks and APIs from macOS are reused (even for the GUI which is written in Objective-C and uses the actual Cocoa APIs), the goal is to achieve compatibility with both macOS an…
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
> custom language Vala wasn't a custom language for elementaryOS, it already existed for years before the first version of the OS (and i think the first version didn't use any Vala code). It most likely used instead of Objective-C because its object system was built on top of glib's gobject system and elementaryOS used Gtk and a lot of other glib/gobject-based libraries. Using Objective-C would mean they'd have to ba…
Of course they could have used GTK from ObjectiveC, in fact it has been proposed.
I have used Vala a bit some years ago to make a Gtk program and it was MUCH easier using it than using Gtk from C directly, so i can understand why they went with it.