Live data from Hacker News

A glitch in the SEO matrix

izzy.co

131–140 of 243 posts

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#131

The majority of times when i search on google I'm looking for someone's personal take on a matter. Whether it's a software recommendation or alternative, a recipe, or experience with a tool. Google only has listicles, top x, or best in 202x. I used to search reddit, but the hostile mobile page ruined that for me. Now i go to yandex and navigate through malware to find what i want. It doesn't help that recent trend of…

Because of widespread spam, astroturfing, hidden shilling, and soon generative AI, there is no way to tell whether something written on the internet was actually someone's personal take or whether it is paid for. I'd argue there's no web forum or social media site anywhere where you can reliably say "this was posted by an actual human and was not paid for."

Sam Altman’s worldcoin and world ID would solve this

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve been heavily considering the 1k Kagi but the limit thing has been giving me pause. I’ve yet to try to trial tho so that should help give context how quickly I burn thru 100

I've noticed that there's a huge misunderstanding among people interested in Kagi: You're not banned from searching after passing the limit in your plan, instead subsequent searches will cost 1.5 cents each. So nothing to sweat.

Nothing to sweat, except money, of course. Not everyone has an open-ended budget.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#133

It's so weird that Google still hasn't created the ability to block spam domains. I don't think it's a technical difficulty but rather a management decision to allow spam as long as they have their adsense ads and it baffles me they just don't care about their end users at all. I think being a monopoly with most competitors lagging a lap behind can make you this way, but with chatgpt catching up quick, Google better…

> it baffles me they just don't care about their end users at all. Just for you, especially for you in fact, I went and dug out this link to an interview with Corey Doctorow where he explains his theory of platform of “enshittification”. https://podtail.com/en/podcast/future-tense-full-program-pod... I think it will interest you to hear a reasonable theory as to why Google doesn’t care as much about their end users a…

Interesting concept. Thanks for sharing!

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#134
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've noticed that there's a huge misunderstanding among people interested in Kagi: You're not banned from searching after passing the limit in your plan, instead subsequent searches will cost 1.5 cents each. So nothing to sweat.

Nothing to sweat, except money, of course. Not everyone has an open-ended budget.

Yes, I tend to forget about the plight of the commoners when sitting at my enormous hoard of several hundred cents.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To further support my argument in favour of manual curation, I would like to ask: why, for the past few years, have people ‘in the know’ been appending “Reddit” to their search strings on Google? Because Reddit is the largest repository of manually curated links, discussions, and original non-encyclopedic information on the internet. People want manually curated information. They don’t want automation which by its ve…

Because they want a bias-filtered selection of the internet. It is very obvious looking at the reddit comments that most are made by bots and not humans, the difference is that most behave similarly and the upvoting favors sameness.

That’s not at all obvious to me. What subreddits do you visit? The ones I frequented had maybe 5% or less bot comments. I think mods generally banned the bots from those subreddits too.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But what's the alternative ? None. And gob help you if you dare search for alternative to _____ .

I find the site AlternativeTo.net usually helps me find good options.

I'm always kinda surprised that this site is still ok, they even clearly provide links to the tools actual pages.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the point of view of someone who spent 10 years running an e-commerce store, and all its advertising, until a couple of years ago. Both SEO and search result ads on Google are dead. The hay day of being able to play the game and make a tidy profit is long gone. Google are playing every trick in the book to extract every possible cent from advertisers, spying on their business and sales to maximise their own prof…

> Both SEO and search result ads on Google are dead And then > Google's visibility of all transactions on every e-commerce website on the internet is insane. Ah, so they have all of the information and yet their ad products don't work. They don't know this?

> their ad products don't work.

It works for them.

They might need to make it work a tad more for their customers if they had to, but right now they apparently don't.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#139

It's so weird that Google still hasn't created the ability to block spam domains. I don't think it's a technical difficulty but rather a management decision to allow spam as long as they have their adsense ads and it baffles me they just don't care about their end users at all. I think being a monopoly with most competitors lagging a lap behind can make you this way, but with chatgpt catching up quick, Google better…

> It's so weird that Google still hasn't created the ability to block spam domains

by who??? Google itself "blocks" or downgrades spam websites all the time. If they open it up to "the people", the same SEO crowd will rush in with scrapers to decimate competition, including any legit websites. So strange to see people jumping into conspiracy theories here without thinking of the consequences for a second.

Re: A glitch in the SEO matrix

#140
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Before the Great Reddit Strike, adding "reddit" or "inurl:reddit.com" helped in that regard pretty well.

Given that the Reddit strike was an almost complete failure it still works well.

I wouldn't say it was a failure per se.

Old content is still there, but new content is of noticeably lower quality. Many subreddits have moved to minimal moderation or stopped it altogether. Engagement in places I used to frequent like /r/Games (which didn't even participate in the strike) is both down considerably and of lower quality.

Reddit, like Twitter, is too big to fail overnight, but they are essentially zombies at this point. Their growth potential has been neutered and their most valuable users (the 1% making 60% of the quality content) are actively toying with alternatives.

Post reply on HN