Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a trash can, not an aircraft's engine
It's still on the plane. If nobody tested it at the pressure a plane is at, and it turns out it explodes and injures the crew, that's not great.
The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
131–140 of 387 posts
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#132Something tells me they've changed their trash can build pipeline to microservices.
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
Corruption?
If you analyze how much the product and all associated processes can actually cost and then find a discrepancy (or find some pointless regulation that drives up the cost so much and explain how it was designed for profit and not purpose) then you can claim corruption. But simply saying "if prices look high to me it must mean corruption" is very naive. If US gov bought cheap plastic stuff from another country instead…
Naive or not, this turns out to be true surprisingly frequently.
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd welcome your contrary explanation if you have one handy.
An alternate explanation would be that their accountants used the average cost method, and the trash can got averaged with a bunch of actual E-3 Sentry planes, or expensive component systems, or something.
https://www.govexec.com/federal-news/1998/12/the-myth-of-the...
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this comment a joke?
Why would it be? Making even consumer products is much harder than it seems. Just look at the myriad failed Kickstarter projects that tried to make consumer stuff. Even getting something normal made in China can be serious work. And far more if you actually want to do a good job of it. Linus Tech Tips put a surprising amount of work into making a screwdriver. Then consider that the military probably has a bunch of re…
....coz they are making 50k of a thing. Not four a year.
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a trash can, not an aircraft's engine
It's still on the plane. If nobody tested it at the pressure a plane is at, and it turns out it explodes and injures the crew, that's not great.
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#137Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#138This is a reducto ad absurdum example of how the US government is paying out the nose to keep a bunch of manufacturing and development work on-shore in the USA. Yeah, sure, it's a trash can, there's no reason it should cost $50k. We're all agreed that's an absurd amount to pay for a trash container. The government isn't just paying for the trash can. They're paying for people to design, tool, and maintain that design…
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#139This is a reducto ad absurdum example of how the US government is paying out the nose to keep a bunch of manufacturing and development work on-shore in the USA. Yeah, sure, it's a trash can, there's no reason it should cost $50k. We're all agreed that's an absurd amount to pay for a trash container. The government isn't just paying for the trash can. They're paying for people to design, tool, and maintain that design…
As a German, it always suprises me how pedantic americans can be when it comes to Letter of the Law vs Spirit of the Law situation. Yes, for Warplane Parts this whole Idea of keeping it inside america and enable local companies to continuously produce parts is reasonable. Having to receive bids for contracts as a public entity is also reasonable. But is there no one in government that can see that a 50k trashcan is j…
It's absolutely possible to apply some level of basic human reason and common sense to such situations. A different accounting convention is probably in order.
Re: The Pentagon’s $52k trash can
#140This is a reducto ad absurdum example of how the US government is paying out the nose to keep a bunch of manufacturing and development work on-shore in the USA. Yeah, sure, it's a trash can, there's no reason it should cost $50k. We're all agreed that's an absurd amount to pay for a trash container. The government isn't just paying for the trash can. They're paying for people to design, tool, and maintain that design…
As a German, it always suprises me how pedantic americans can be when it comes to Letter of the Law vs Spirit of the Law situation. Yes, for Warplane Parts this whole Idea of keeping it inside america and enable local companies to continuously produce parts is reasonable. Having to receive bids for contracts as a public entity is also reasonable. But is there no one in government that can see that a 50k trashcan is j…