Earlier quoted context omitted.
Citation? I ask because I'm interested in making sure I'm healthy, not to just be a jerk on the internet, and if that's true I'm doing something wrong.
No citations exist. My comment was directed at the grandparent whose original symptoms warranted taking dangerous MAOIs. In that case, I would consider an off literature treatment to fix the vitamin D deficiency as fast as possible. Tanning beds are carcinogenic and not recommended for general health.
Modafinil and Startups
131–134 of 134 posts
Re: Modafinil and Startups
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is why blogs with no comments annoy me - how is the author supposed to find out that he made an obvious mistake? Email? His site-wide byline is a mailto.
Yes, so I can email him and hope he will update or edit or admit he's wrong, and also accept that by the time he does so most readers will be gone - rather than post a public comment he would specifically have to censor, and my correction be visible in time for most readers to see if they care to. I hope you can see why I would regard one alternative as way better than the other.
Why, again, would I prefer to email him?
Re: Modafinil and Startups
#133Seems like there's a lot of consensus here that Modafinil has no known dangerous side effects. I'm a little curious and concerned about the potentially fatal skin conditions (SJS, etc.) mentioned in the wikipedia article though: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil#Side_effects Anyone know about this? Is this a race-specific problem? Or just not as dangerous a risk as it sounds?
Look carefully at the FDA information and run the numbers to decide for yourself: http://www.gwern.net/Modafinil#side-effects
Re: Modafinil and Startups
#134My subjective experience with driving on Modafinil is very different: I become significantly more aware of everything on the road. It turns me into a laser, sure, but a laser that's constantly scanning back and forth. Too many confounding factors to say why that is.
I haven't noticed any diminishing of 'broad thinking'. Not sure I could claim any increase, though.
His claim that it's better to get productive days through other means seems to be a false dichotomy: Modafinil isn't dangerous like he's convinced it is, and while you can get productive through better health and rest, you can get even more productive by eating healthy, exercising, resting properly, and taking Modafinil. It's not clear why he thinks that Modafinil will force you to be unhealthy, thus making it a choice between "healthy" and "moda" (Honestly, the days when I take Modafinil, I find I have the focus to exercise harder and longer, and the willpower to eat much healthier).
His points about 'shortcut to a really productive day', 'having a clear big task to focus on', and 'drink a lot of water' are all spot-on, though.
I have to disagree with his recommendations: I think Modafinil's value proposition is positive for almost everyone, and proportionally more valuable as the value of your time or focus increases. HN readers in particular tend to have valuable time and extremely valuable focus; Modafinil is a huge gain, something like a large fraction of just the positives of amphetamines, with the negatives of caffeine instead.
The illustrious gwern has an article covering the medical research, benefits, risks, a novel cost/benefit analysis, and supplier information here: http://www.gwern.net/Modafinil
(Yes, it's been linked a few times already in this discussion. Go read it already.)