Live data from Hacker News

Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

nato.int

131–140 of 521 posts

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Imagine joining a defense union when your neighbor declares war on another neighbor. The audacity!

[flagged]

Russia has invaded Finland multiple times over the last few hundred years. The Finns have never perceived the risk as non-existent, and the invasion of Ukraine (coming on the heels of Georgia) makes them understandably increase their estimate of its likelihood.

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Wouldn't it be smarter to actually listen to what Russia is trying to say? No. Nobody should care what Russia has to say about another country voluntarily wanting to (and joining) NATO > the irony is that the expansion of NATO gives the US ability to force its will upon NATO members and its neighbors All NATO members joined voluntarily. None of your business. > the ambitions are not different from the ambitions of…

> No. Nobody should care what Russia has to say about another country voluntarily wanting to (and joining) NATO

I'm sorry, but Russia's concern is not out of thin air - you can only join NATO if your membership is not a threat to your border countries. This is one of the rules of NATO itself.

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#133

Finland got de-Finlandized at last. Which is what the expansion of NATO was always about. NATO isn't a threat to Russia itself - if Russia seriously feared NATO aggression, it wouldn't voluntarily demilitarize its NATO borders during the past 13 months. NATO expansion just neutralizes Russian ability to force its will upon its neighbors through threat of aggression (or in case like Ukraine through the use of aggressi…

[flagged]

> Wouldn't it be smarter to actually listen to what Russia is trying to say?

What is Russia trying to say?

They want to install their own people in other countries regardless of the locals choice?

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reading about what the Soviet Union did in countries like Estonia and Ukraine is pretty harrowing stuff. Wanting to join NATO for protection after is completely understandable and denying them because it would upset their former (and present) abuser is a shameful thought.

Very true. Though it's good to remember the Soviet Union did even worse things to Russia.

Current russia is direct descendant of Soviet Union with all the priviledges - security council seat, got all the nuclear arms.

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#135

Finland got de-Finlandized at last. Which is what the expansion of NATO was always about. NATO isn't a threat to Russia itself - if Russia seriously feared NATO aggression, it wouldn't voluntarily demilitarize its NATO borders during the past 13 months. NATO expansion just neutralizes Russian ability to force its will upon its neighbors through threat of aggression (or in case like Ukraine through the use of aggressi…

[flagged]

> Wouldn't it be smarter to actually listen to what Russia is trying to say?

Russia says a lot of things, often contradictory, but what really speaks is their actions. Invading Ukraine wasn’t about denazification, or nato threat, or anything except naked imperialism.

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#137
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These questions are irrelevant. The tactical significance of Finland to Russia is small compared to the resources required to invade it as is. Due to bad cost/benefit ratio it is therefore unlikely for Russia to attack Finland. But now that Finland is part of NATO it has to bear the cost when some other country gets attacked. It's a bad deal.

Exactly one[0] NATO country has ever been attacked and that wasn’t even in Europe but in the Falkland Islands. Being a member state is a pretty good bet on not being invaded. [0] not counting non-nation state terrorist attacks on various members

It is also interesting to note that 9/11 resulted in the first and only time article 5 was invoked.

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#138
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They've been trying for ~13months already and haven't done so, why do you think they could do it now? Especially after losing 150,000+ soldiers (dead and/or wounded), and thousands of tanks and other armored vehicles? They've lost tens of thousands of troops and dozens/hundreds of vehicles just trying to take one town since August (Bakhmut).

Fog of war. You can't know what is happening. The only numbers I believe is the additional cost in $ and € the western taxpayer is burdened with. Because that is guaranteed.

Be as precise as possible, exactly what number of £€$ do you believe the western taxpayers are burdened with?

Re: Finland becomes the 31st member of NATO

#139

[flagged]

The problem there is that you (and Putin) are viewing NATO's expansion as a curtailing of "Russia's sovereignty". Doing this probably means you take the view that the Spheres of Influence concept was correct: big blocs (Russia, China, US, EU) have an area of political/military/ideological influence that extends past their physical borders, and any other country exerting influence over the countries within those bound…

I agree spheres of influence is a worrying idea. But couldn’t you argue the same thing is happening to Ukraine under a US sphere of influence? Isn’t that bad too?
Post reply on HN