Here's the thing... so many jobs are bullshit. So many things people are paid to write, presentations made, etc. are bullshit. I'm not judging the bullshit per se. There's good bullshit and bad, necessary bullshit and not. But yeah, when you accept this reality, AI is sort of perfect for the bullshit that exists in our lives.
We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
131–140 of 425 posts
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#132Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#133I found the article really difficult to read, so I summarised it with ChatGPT Large language models like the GPT family are statistical models that learn the structure of language by predicting missing words in sentences. These models are seen as "bullshit generators" as they have no idea what they are talking about and are designed to produce baseless assertions with confidence. The addition of reinforcement learnin…
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34662167
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#134> However, as I spell out in my book, the concept of AGI is inseparable from the kind of hierarchy of intelligence that has underpinned ideas of innate supremacy since the days of empire and colonialism. I think this line discredits the entire article, which was already a few obvious points blown at gale force into the reader’s ear.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#135> However, as I spell out in my book, the concept of AGI is inseparable from the kind of hierarchy of intelligence that has underpinned ideas of innate supremacy since the days of empire and colonialism. I think this line discredits the entire article, which was already a few obvious points blown at gale force into the reader’s ear.
> Saying, as the OpenAI CEO does[1], that we are all 'stochastic parrots' like large language models, statistical generators of learned patterns that express nothing deeper, is a form of nihilism. Of course, the elites don't apply that to themselves, just to the rest of us. The structural injustices and supremacist perspectives layered into AI put it firmly on the path of eugenicist solutions to social problems.
[1] Sam Altman: i am a stochastic parrot, and so r u
That this isn't even sentence-to-sentence consistent is somehow one of the less egregious aspects of it.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#136The BS that ChatGPT generates is especially odious because it requires so much effort to detect if you're not a SME in whatever output it's giving. Plus, the output, when wrong, is subtly wrong- it's usually not obvious BS, it's credible BS. If you are not competent in the particular area you're asking about, you likely don't have the skills to recognize BS. It also is a time saver, doing work that most people find u…
Small and Medium-sized Enterprise?
What's SME in this instance?
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#137I found the article really difficult to read, so I summarised it with ChatGPT Large language models like the GPT family are statistical models that learn the structure of language by predicting missing words in sentences. These models are seen as "bullshit generators" as they have no idea what they are talking about and are designed to produce baseless assertions with confidence. The addition of reinforcement learnin…
I’m not sure why we need comments from people proud that they couldn’t be troubled to read the article that is supposedly being discussed, but it seems like a popular genre of reply whenever something tech-critical is posted.
I can prove this without having ever interacted with ChatGPT.
The problem with "A.I." is that it continues to only be able to take the 'almost best' sum of ideology and not invent new ideas. AI cannot innovate. It can only imitate.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#138"ChatGPT isn't really new but simply an iteration of the class war that's been waged since the start of the industrial revolution." I'm scared too but this is literally neo-ludite sperging.
Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#139Re: We come to bury ChatGPT, not to praise it
#140ChatGPT has been criticized for not knowing some facts about the world, or math. But many people don't know facts about the world, or math. Math is something that people have to learn over many years, which is difficult for some people (even just at the level of arithmetic).
Thinking, to the average person, is about rearranging a salad of words into something that "resonates". Plus some non-verbal reasoning, like how do I rotate this suitcase to fit into this trunk; but this is fundamentally just the same thing.