Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a great article, and balancing free speech with censorship is a difficult problem. But it becomes a constant headache only on centralized platforms, where no amount of resources can realistically monitor and filter all content. This scales in complexity as the platform grows, which is the goal of any centralized service. And if the business model depends on advertising, it becomes even messier and crucial to i…
You didn't answer the question. The question was, to wit, >How do you keep CP off it? Your answer was: >I don't, just don't look at the CP. The problem really in question here is: You've just created a new distribution method for this type of thing and punted the consequences for someone else to deal with. (Which is totally cool imo, but newsflash, expect to be the subject of a hit piece some time in the forseeable f…
So, the OP has just given people a whole new way of making themselves liable for illegal content, just by running the P2P software in question.
In most cases, the police aren't interested in hauling a service provider into jail, they want to haul in the person who put that content there. But this does make a nice little lever that the police can use against any service provider.